• Care Home
  • Care home

Rathgar Care Home

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

349 Kettering Road, Northampton, Northamptonshire, NN3 6QT (01604) 499003

Provided and run by:
Rathgar Care Home Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 30 April 2026 – 19 May 2026.

Rathgar Care Home is a care home providing personal care for up to 23 older people and specialises in caring for people with dementia. The home is an extended and adapted detached house in a residential area. The accommodation is spread over two floors accessed by a lift and stairs. At the time of our assessment there were 20 people living at the home.

We visited the service on 30 April 2026, 1 May 2026, 7 May 2026 and 14 May 2026. We reviewed documents and had follow up contact with the provider until 15 May 2026. We finished the assessment on 19 May 2026.

This was a fully comprehensive assessment carried out due to the length of time since we last rated the service.

This assessment was conducted by one inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service. We spoke with six people who live at the service, nine relatives, and thirteen staff including care, kitchen, domestic, activities, administration and the registered manager and nominated individual.

The provider delivered care within a service where there were clear strengths in the culture, staff commitment and aspects of day-to-day care delivery. People, relatives and external professionals consistently provided positive feedback about the caring nature of staff and the environment. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people’s needs in practice and worked collaboratively with healthcare professionals to support positive outcomes for people.

There was evidence of a positive and inclusive culture within the service. People were supported to maintain their independence, participate in meaningful activities, and were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Staff spoke passionately about their roles and demonstrated a commitment to providing person-centred care.

The feedback we received demonstrated that leaders were compassionate and inclusive. In relation to the registered manager people told us, “This [registered manager] is brilliant,” and, “[Manager] is lovely – you couldn’t get anyone better.” We received similar feedback in relation the nominated individual. A person told us, “On a Monday and a Thursday, [nominated individual] comes and sits with me and talks to me – [nominated individual] is nice”. The positive feedback was echoed by staff who told us, “[Nominated individual] is very involved – it is very good [they] are approachable,” and, “[Nominated individual] has a good bond with residents”.

Although we did not find evidence of harm to people, the provider had not consistently ensured that systems and processes were effective. Governance was not always robust and had not identified a number of the concerns we found during the assessment in relation to aspects of safety and oversight. The provider assured us they had reflected on our findings and told us the actions they were taking, and how they would sustain improvements for the future.

We identified a breach of regulation in relation to good governance. This service has been rated Requires Improvement overall. We have asked the provider to submit an action plan in response to the concerns identified during this assessment.

7 February 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Rathgar Care Home is a care home providing personal care for up to 23 older people in an extended and adapted detached house in a residential area. The accommodation is spread over two floors accessed by a lift and stairs. There were 15 people living at the home at the time of our inspection.

We found the following examples of good practice.

The provider had robust systems and processes in place to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Visitors had their temperature taken, completed a COVID-19 screening questionnaire, had to evidence their vaccination status and show a negative COVID test before being allowed to enter the home.

The environment appeared clean and had no odours. The disposal of personal protective equipment (PPE) followed government guidance and best practice.

Risk assessments were in place for people and staff regarding individual risk factors of COVID-19. Staff and people were regularly tested and had received COVID-19 vaccinations.

Staff wore appropriate PPE. Staff changed their uniform before and after their shift. All staff had received infection prevention and control and donning and doffing training. Staff had regular donning and doffing checks to support staff to ensure they were applying and removing their PPE effectively.

The registered manager completed regular audits to ensure oversight of IPC practices.

1 May 2018

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on the 1 May 2018 and was unannounced.

Rathgar Care Home is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

The home accommodates up to 23 older people in an extended and adapted detached house in a residential area. The accommodation is spread over two floors accessed by a lift and stairs. At the time of our inspection there were 20 people staying there.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People received care from staff that knew them and were kind, compassionate and respectful. Staff spent time with people and understood their individual needs.

People’s needs were assessed prior to coming to the home and detailed person-centred care plans were in place and were kept under review. Risks to people had been identified and measures put in place to mitigate any risk.

There were sufficient staff to meet the needs of people; staffing levels were kept under review. Staff were supported through regular supervisions and undertook training, which helped them to understand the needs of the people they were supporting.

There were appropriate recruitment processes in place to protect people from being cared for by unsuitable staff and people were safe in the home. Staff understood their responsibilities to keep people safe from any risk or harm and knew how to respond if they had any concerns.

People were involved in decisions about the way in which their care and support was provided. Staff understood the need to undertake specific assessments where people lacked capacity to consent to their care and /or their day-to-day routines.

People’s health care and nutritional needs were carefully considered and relevant health care professionals were appropriately involved in people’s care.

People were cared for by staff who were respectful of their dignity and who demonstrated an understanding of each person’s needs. This was evident in the way staff spoke to people and the activities they engaged in with individuals. Relatives spoke positively about the care their relative received and felt that they could approach management and staff to discuss any issues or concerns they had.

There were systems in place to monitor the quality and standard of the home. Regular audits were undertaken and any shortfalls addressed.

The registered manager and provider were approachable and people felt confident that any issues or concerns raised would be addressed and appropriate action taken.

The service strived to remain up to date with legislation and best practice and worked with outside agencies to look at ways to improve the experience for people.