• Doctor
  • Out of hours GP service

Bradford Care Alliance CIC Also known as Bradford Care Alliance CIC Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Ridge Medical Centre, Cousen Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 3JX (01274) 425600

Provided and run by:
Bradford Care Alliance CIC

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Bradford Care Alliance CIC on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Bradford Care Alliance CIC, you can give feedback on this service.

9 and 10 August 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection 29 June 2021- Requires Improvement)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of Bradford Care Alliance CIC between the 8 and 10 August 2022. This inspection was carried out to review the breach of regulations and the concerns identified at the inspection on 29 June 2021.

At this inspection we found:

At the previous inspection in June 2021 we rated the provider as requires improvement overall and requires improvement for providing safe, effective and well-led services. We rated the provider as good for providing caring and responsive services. At this inspection we found the provider had responded to our concerns and made significant improvements following our last inspection.

For example:

  • The provider had developed processes to maintain oversight of the hub sites. Systems were in place to ensure that premises and equipment were safe.
  • The provider had implemented effective processes to manage the recruitment and training of staff.
  • The provider had reviewed their systems to manage risk and respond to concerns and complaints. When incidents did happen, the provider learned from them and improved their processes. This information was shared with staff via bulletins and regular emails.
  • Patients reported that they were able to access care when they needed it. Feedback from patients regarding the services provided was positive.
  • The practice operated effectively to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Staff told us they enjoyed working for the provider and were kept up to date with information and changes to the service.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

The service was commissioned to provide the primary care streaming service (PCSS) offered at the local hospital. We found strong, professional and reciprocal relationships between the team and the staff working within the emergency department (ED) which kept patients safe. Safety netting arrangements were in place for patients when they presented and when they moved between the PCSS and the ED. Continual assessment of the patients needs was in place and regular communication and attendance at afternoon ED ‘huddles’ (short meetings to review patient flow, presentation, staffing and safety) gave a clear clinical picture of any challenges or issues. An oversight of quality and safety was in place and embedded into the team.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

29 June 2021

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as requires improvement overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – requires improvement

Are services effective? – requires improvement

Are services caring? – good

Are services responsive? – good

Are services well-led? – requires improvement

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Bradford Care Alliance CIC as part of our inspection programme.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic the Care Quality Commission (CQC) has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

• Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing and telephone calls

• requesting evidence from the provider

• a site visit.

As part of this inspection we interviewed, by video conferencing or telephone calls, the Chief Operating Manager, the Service Development and Governance Officer, the Operational Delivery and Performance Manager, two reception staff, a physiotherapist, one nurse, a GP who worked within the primary care streaming service and the Corporate Director.

On the day of the inspection we interviewed the Medical Director, the Chair of the board, the Registered Manager, the Strategic Director, the Human Resource (HR)/ Finance and Operational Delivery Assistant, a GP working in the extended access service, a member of the reception team, a nurse and a healthcare assistant (HCA).

Our Findings:

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this provider as requires improvement overall and requires improvement for providing safe, effective and well-led services. We have rated the key questions of caring and responsive as good.

We found that:

  • Whilst regular visits were undertaken to the hub sites, the provider could not evidence that the systems and processes in place enabled them to maintain appropriate or complete oversight of health and safety, fire or infection prevention and control for staff or patients at these sites.
  • The provider did not have a system to monitor and maintain oversight of the staff working in the hub sites. The provider did not have oversight or evidence relating to the competencies, training, professional registration updates, vaccination status or disclosure and barring checks (DBS) for staff who were providing the regulated activities.
  • The service had a clear process in place to manage complaints and significant events and we saw these were reviewed at several levels within the organisation. Whilst we saw that actions were taken and lessons learned, not all staff who we spoke with were aware of the outcomes or any learning arising from significant events and complaints. None of the complaints we reviewed contained information of how the lessons learned or changes made to services were discussed and disseminated to staff.
  • Staff treated people with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Patient feedback was positive and reflected that patients were able to access care and treatment at a time to suit them. The service was described as helpful, caring and convenient.
  • There was limited evidence of quality improvement, including clinical audit. The provider did not monitor the quality of the clinical interventions provided by staff. They did not offer appraisals, supervisions or provide regular meetings and updates to all staff.
  • Patients were able to access care and treatment from the service within an appropriate and responsive timescale for their needs.
  • There was a focus on continuous learning and improvement at senior management level. Leaders were committed to the vision and values of the organisation and were motivated to provide responsive care which met patient’s needs.

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

  • Ensure that care and treatment is provided in a safe way for service users.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review their arrangements for communicating with staff regarding the named leads for organisational policies.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care