• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Goscote Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Goscote Lane, Walsall, WS3 1SJ (01922) 652497

Provided and run by:
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 30 June 2026 to 2 July 2026. The service is a shared lives scheme. A shared lives scheme recruit, train and support self-employed shared lives carers who offer accommodation and support arrangements for people within their own family homes. This includes long term placements, short breaks and respite care. The service is registered to care for people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. At the time of our inspection, the service was supporting 20 people in long term placements who were in receipt of personal care. Only a small number of these 20 people were able to tell us about their care.

In this report, we sometimes refer to people using the service, the relatives of people using the service, shared lives carers who shared their homes with people and shared lives staff, including shared lives officers and the registered manager, who managed, monitored and coordinated the work of the shared lives carers. This assessment was carried out due to the age of the rating for the service.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’. This guidance supported judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choice, independence and access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Safe care was delivered to people. The care people received was assessed, planned for and reviewed. Individual risks to people were also managed safely. People and those important to them were involved with this process. However, improvements were needed to ensure care plans were detailed and contained all the information required about people’s care needs.

Medicines were managed safely. Infection control was considered. The principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 were understood. People’s end-of-life wishes and plans had been considered. People were protected from potential abuse.

People were treated in a kind and caring way by carers and staff they felt comfortable with who were safely recruited. Carers and staff had the skills and training to provide safe and effective support. The registered manager had identified refresher training was needed for some carers and had plans in place for this.

There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service. People, relatives and carers felt listened to and involved with the service.

5 June 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Goscote Centre is a shared lives service that provides care and support to people within a family environment. Approved Shared Lives Carers support adults with a learning disability or autism. People lived with their carers on a short or long-term basis depending on their needs. There was 66 people using the service at the time of the inspection. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects the regulated activity of 'personal care' being provided to people who use the service. However, we do take account of any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Some aspects of record keeping and systems to monitor and improve the quality of the service people received needed further development. We found risks to the health and safety of people were usually fully assessed and the provider took reasonable steps to lessen such risks. People told us that they felt safe living with their carers. The provider carried out safe recruitment processes to protect people from harm.

There was a staffing structure in place that ensured there was enough staff to support the role of the shared lives carers. Regular meetings took place with carers and staff so that there was an opportunity to learn and share good practice.

Carers knew how to support people to eat and drink enough to keep them well. People were supported to have their mental and physical healthcare needs met. Shared Lives staff and carers sought and took advice from relevant health professionals when needed.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

All the people we spoke with told us they liked where they were living and they were well cared for. People were given choices and control over their care. Staff and carers protected people's privacy and dignity when supporting people. People were supported to be as independent as possible.

We found systems were in place for Shared Lives workers to follow so that assessment and monitoring of carers and the shared lives placement took place. People and their relatives knew who to contact if they had any complaints. The registered manager provided staff with appropriate leadership and support. Shared Lives staff and carers told us the registered manager was approachable and supportive.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 19 December 2016). Since this rating was awarded the service has moved premises. We have used the previous rating to inform our planning and decisions about the rating at this inspection.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.