• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Cornwall Care Respite Services

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

38 Polweath Road, Penzance, Cornwall, TR18 3PN (01736) 330638

Provided and run by:
Cornwall Care Limited

All Inspections

10th November 2014

During a routine inspection

Cornwall Care Respite also known as The Bungalow provides residential support for short breaks and day care for adults with a range of learning disabilities. This includes but is not exclusive of autism, sensory impairment and physical disability.

The service is designed to accommodate people with a range of disabilities. Some rooms have en-suite facilities including ‘wet areas’ for people whose disability means access to bathing is limited. In addition the service has a range of equipment specifically designed for people with physical and mobility issues.

When we undertook the inspection the home did not have a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager post was vacant and the deputy manager was running the service. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) had been informed of the management situation and the commission had been notified of the actions the organisation was taking to meet the homes conditions of registration.

We saw the people using the respite services of The Bungalow were being supported by caring and respectful staff. For example one person told us, “I have used a lot of services for the person, but by far this is the best. The staff are so very caring”. People visiting during the inspection were made to feel welcome by staff and those using the service that day. The atmosphere was inclusive, with people moving around the building without restriction. People were laughing and smiling. Staff were assisting them to engage in a range of activities of their choice. Peoples preferred method of communication was taken into account and respected.

Staff working at The Bungalow understood the needs of people they were caring for and supporting. One person said, It’s a lovely job and very rewarding. As it’s a small service we get to know the needs of people really well. We also support families because that’s needed as well”. A relative told us, “Staff tell me if anything has changed. They are always warm and friendly”.

Staff were able to describe how people were protected from the risk of abuse. The service had safeguards in place for people who may not have had the capacity to make decisions about their care, support and safety.

Staffing levels were sufficient to provide the support people required. We saw staff had time to spend with people in a way which was unhurried and personal to them. Where people needed individual support this was provided. One person told us, “The way we work is really flexible and as we work as a team we help each other out because it can be very intense sometimes”.

Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. They said they had received a good induction to introduce them into their roles. One person said, “I felt much more confident to do the job after my induction. It was very good”. Training opportunities meant staff had the competencies and skills to meet the responsibilities of care and support.

The premises were well maintained, designed and equipped to support people with a range of disabilities and mobility issues. There were enough areas for people to take part in activities or spend time on their own.

Staff told us they felt valued by managers and supported in their roles. One person said, “It’s a pleasure to come to work. We all work as one team and the manager’s door is always open”.

The governance manager and interim manager worked closely together to monitor and evaluate care and support. They used information gained from people using the service, relatives and external professionals to improve the service.

1 December 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During our inspection we spoke with the registered manager, deputy manager and two members of staff. On the day of our inspection six people were staying at the home.

Since our last inspection the registered manager had ensured that all records were up to date and available.

We reviewed the supervision records and saw that staff were supported to carry out their role effectively. However one policy we looked at did not reflect what staff were asked to complete. The registered manager advised us this would be addressed with the provider.

We looked at all the records and procedures and saw that the complaints procedures were followed and dealt with appropriately.

25 June 2013

During a routine inspection

Some of the people who used the service were not able to comment in detail about the service they received due to their healthcare needs. We spoke with two relatives of people who lived at Cornwall Care Respite Services (The Bungalow) to get their views of the service, and they told us they were happy with the care provided. We sat in the main communal area for approximately 45 minutes. We observed the staff talking with people who used the service and saw they were respectful, friendly and supportive to them. We saw people who used the service freely approach staff without hesitation, and we saw people sharing a joke with staff and the manager.

Care records showed and people we spoke with confirmed they were given information to help them make decisions for themselves where possible, and we found people's privacy, dignity and independence were respected and upheld. We saw people's wishes were respected.

Care plans and associated documentation did not always provide sufficient detail to direct and guide staff on the action they needed to take in order to meet people's assessed care needs.

The home was clean throughout at the time of the inspection, and records confirmed the environment and equipment used were properly maintained.

Staff were trained, but not fully supported to carry out their roles.

24 July 2012

During a routine inspection

On the day of our inspection there were five people staying at the home for one or more nights. We were able to speak to all five people to seek their views of the service that they were provided with. They told us that they liked being at Cornwall Care Respite Services. They and the staff referred to the service as 'The Bungalow'.

One person told us that they were coming to spend a week at The Bungalow in September while their family went on holiday. They appeared to be excited about this by their facial expressions and the way in which they repeatedly said they were coming for a week.

Two people who used the service told us that they liked the bedrooms and they liked choosing which one they stayed in.

Four people who used the service told us they liked the food provided. They said that they were able to choose what they wanted to eat.

We observed staff providing care to people who used the service and this was carried out in a kind and respectful manner.