We carried out a review of the data available to us about Manor House on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Manor House, you can give feedback on this service.
We found the following examples of good practice.
A visiting pod could be accessed by loved ones without entering the home. There was a booking system available and a microphone system to aid communication. This meant people could enjoy visits in a safe and comfortable environment.
Staff completed a daily tracker record of the people they had worked closely with. This meant that in the event of COVID-19 positive cases, the home could identify who had been in recent close contact.
Staff wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in line with government guidance. PPE stations and clinical waste bins were available on each floor.
People had COVID-19 risk assessments that considered self-isolation. The assessments were updated monthly when people received their COVID-19 test results.
People’s observations were taken regularly to monitor for symptoms of COVID-19. This supported staff to identify if a person was displaying symptoms of infection.
Staff used handheld devices to update people's care records. The devices also supported socially distanced staff handovers. This minimised the spread of infection.
The provider had implemented a contact policy for loved ones during the pandemic. This was updated to reflect current guidance and set out alternative arrangements for when home visits were not possible.
At the time of our last comprehensive inspection in June 2015, the home (under the previous provider name) was rated as ‘Good’. At this inspection we found that the registered manager had continued to develop the service in order to excel the good standards of care provided to people and we found that some aspects of the service were outstanding.
Manor House is a residential care home that is registered to provide accommodation for up to 37 people who require support with their personal care. At the time of our inspection, there were 36 people living at the home.
There was a registered manager in post in accordance with the conditions of their registration with us. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People living at the home were extremely happy with the service they received because they felt very safe, comfortable and respected by the staff that supported them. People felt valued by the staff and were involved in all aspects of their care as well as the running of the service. People felt that their opinions were listened to and respected; it was clear that the registered manager encouraged people living at the home to be in control of their own lives and their home environment. Care was personalised and staff treated people as individuals with the utmost respect; they were exceptionally kind, caring and compassionate, making all interactions count. People were supported and inspired to maintain their hobbies and interests because staff took the time to get to know them and encouraged people to engage in activities that were meaningful to them. People were supported to maintain valued contact with people who were important to them. Staff built trusting and supportive relationships with people and their relatives. All of which contributed to ensuring people received an excellent caring service.
Meal times at the home mirrored a social event where people were supported to eat food that was freshly prepared, well-presented and that met their dietary requirements all in accordance with people’s likes, dislikes and preferences. People received the right level of support to both maintain their independence but also to meet their needs discreetly whilst eating. There was a relaxed, calm and social ambience within the home which promoted people’s comfort and well-being.
People felt safe living at the home and enjoyed the security of the staffs’ presence without feeling unduly restricted in any way; people were supported to feel at home. Staff knew how to keep people safe from the risks associated with their health and care needs and the provider had ensured that there were enough members of staff available, who had been safely recruited to meet people’s needs. This meant that people received the care they required when they required it, including their prescribed medicines.
People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm because staff had received training and had the knowledge and skills they required to do their job effectively. Risk assessments and management plans promoted people’s safety within the home.
People’s abilities to make decisions were assessed and care and support was provided with their consent. Where people lacked the mental capacity to consent to their care, people’s rights were protected because the provider ensured that key processes had been followed so that people were not unlawfully restricted and that decisions were made within their best interest. These decisions were made in consultation with other professionals involved in their care as well as with friends and relatives, making sure that all relevant persons were involved in meeting people’s needs safely and effectively. People were supported to maintain good health because staff worked closely with other health and social care professionals when necessary.
People felt involved in the planning and review of their care as well as in the running of the home because they were encouraged to offer feedback on the quality of the service. People were continuously consulted and felt influential in any decisions made within the home to drive constant improvement. People knew how to and felt comfortable raising a complaint and felt that they would be listened to and action would be taken quickly and effectively.
The provider had staff appreciation initiatives to recognise staffs’ commitment, dedication and contribution to the delivery of a high quality and safe service. Staff felt supported and appreciated in their work and reported the management team to be approachable. The management team had effective systems in place to continuously and consistently assess, monitor and proactively promote the quality and safety of the service. The management team were dedicated and committed to doing all that they could in accordance with current best practice to ensure the service was the best it could be for the people living at the home. They were well organised and led by example acting as role models for other staff. The registered manager ensured that all information required was comprehensively detailed and accessible to guarantee their compliance with the requirements of their registration.