• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

District Home Care Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

3 Railway Cottages, St Johns Lye, Woking, Surrey, GU21 7SG (01483) 721515

Provided and run by:
District Home Care Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

About the service

District Home Care Ltd is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care and support to people living in their own homes, including live-in care.

Who the service is for

District Home Care Ltd provides support to younger adults, older adults, people living with dementia, people with physical disabilities and people living with sensory impairments. At the time of the inspection 32 people were being supported with personal care.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment from 3 July to 16 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, we highlight key themes and people’s experience.

People were supported by staff who had the skills and knowledge to support them safely. A healthcare professional told us, “The care agency ensured they were providing the safest level of care. They genuinely had the best interest of the person and were doing everything in their power to support them safely.” A relative told us, “I am very happy, staff are trained properly, my relative’s individual needs are all dealt with.” Staff practice and competency was reviewed using spot checks. Staff recruitment procedures were safe.

Safeguarding systems were in place to safeguard people from the risk of abuse, and these had been audited. Staff were trained in safeguarding and were knowledgeable of safeguarding systems, and recognising and reporting potential abuse. A member of told us, “When I started, I did online training which is refreshed every year. I just completed mine for this year.” There were systems in place to record accidents and incidents. and lessons were learnt and care changed as a result to prevent recurrence.

We checked and found that staff and management worked within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice control and freedom over their lives. A member of staff told us, “We assume people have capacity. Even if they don’t, they can still be supported to make some decisions some days.”

Risks were assessed and people were involved in the process. A healthcare professional told us that, “all advice provided to manage people’s risks was being carried out by the carers.” There were effective systems in place to administer medicines.

People’s needs were assessed and recorded in their care plans. People were asked for their consent before support was given. A member of staff told us, “I always ask for consent before giving personal care. I look at people’s care plans first, so I know how they like to be supported. If someone declines a shower, I will try and encourage them but if they don’t want it then I will not push them.” People’s care was monitored and improvements had been made and recorded.

People were treated as individuals and with care, compassion and dignity. People were encouraged to maintain their independence. A relative told us, “Staff know all about my loved one’s dementia and mobility. All the staff are very good at getting him up and walking and keeping him mobile.”

 

The service had a culture of person-centred care, where staff provided support to meet people’s individual needs and preferences. Staff told us that care plans had the information they needed to provide the care people wanted and required. Staff knew people well and care was delivered in a way to reduce people’s anxieties. For example, staff were proactive in providing a person with information on when the things that were important to them would happen. Care was delivered by consistent staff.

 

People and relatives were listened to. Satisfaction surveys were sent to people and relatives alongside regular calls from the management team to ensure they were happy with the service they were receiving. Changes were made based on the feedback received.

There was a culture of openness and passion in providing person-centred care within the service. Staff told us that District Home Care Ltd was a good place to work, that they felt supported and received the training to do their job. Staff told us they were listened to. One member of staff told us, “Management will ask us for our input in meetings. We have recently made a request around the current heatwave, and they have listened and will provide thinner and lighter uniform during the hot months.”

Care delivery systems were in place which were regularly audited. This meant there was oversight of care and consistency of delivery was maintained, with flexibility to ensure outcomes for people. A health care professional told us, “The registered manager went above and beyond to support the discharge on a person home from hospital.” There were systems in place to review people’s care, and action was taken where the provider identified areas for improvement.

31 May 2018

During a routine inspection

District Home Care is a domiciliary care agency which provides care and support to people in their own homes. It provides a service to older people living with dementia, sensory impairment and physical disabilities. The agency had a total of 14 people who received the regulated activity of personal care.

The inspection took place on 31 May 2018 and was announced. This was the first inspection since the service registered with the Care Quality Commission in April 2017.

People and their relatives told us they felt safe with staff who attended to them because they were kind and caring. Staff were aware of the process to follow and external agencies to contact if they had witnessed any abuse. Robust recruitment processes were followed to help ensure that only suitable people were employed at the agency. Medicines were administered safely and people told us they always received them on time. Measures were in place to monitor and prevent the spread of infection that would affect people’s health. Accidents and incidents were recorded in detail and reviewed by the registered manager to identify any measures that could reduce the risk of a recurrence. These were discussed with staff to make them aware. The registered manager was in the process of recruiting three new staff to add to the team.

People’s needs and choices had been assessed and their care, treatment and support were delivered in line with the pre-admission assessment as discussed with them. People received effective care and support from staff who had received training appropriate to their roles. People were supported to have enough to eat and drink to keep them stay healthy and they had access to all healthcare professionals as and when required. People’s rights under the mental capacity act (MCA) were respected.

People were treated with kindness and compassion in their day-to-day care from caring and supportive staff that had got to know them well. People were supported to express their views and were involved in making decisions about their care, support and treatment. People’s privacy and dignity was respected by staff and they were encouraged to be as independent as they were able. The registered manager and staff told us that they treated all people as individuals and their individuality was respected.

People had person centred care plans that had been developed with them from the information provided in the pre-admissions assessment. People told us they had been involved with their care plans. People knew how to make a complaint and who to make a complaint to and complaints were taken seriously and used as an opportunity to improve the service. The provider would work with the appropriate agencies to ensure that end of life care was provided sensitively and in line with people’s needs and preferences.

People, relatives and staff benefited from a well-managed service. The provider and staff worked together to ensure that all aspects of the service functioned effectively. Quality assurance systems were in place to ensure that the quality and of service provided to people was of a good sustained standard. People and those important to them had opportunities to feedback their views about the home. The provider and staff worked with other related agencies that ensured people received joined up care, treatment and support. The service was supported with other healthcare professional services to ensure people’s health needs were met.