• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Cera - Derbyshire

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

11 Market Place, Chapel En Le Frith, High Peak, Derbyshire, SK23 0EN 0333 999 7624

Provided and run by:
Cera Care Operations Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 12 February 2026 to 12 March 2026.

Cera Derbyshire is a supported living service which provides personal care for people with a learning disability, autistic people, and adults of all ages who may have dementia, sensory impairments, or physical disability. Nursing care was not provided to people by this service.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The Cera Derbyshire homecare service had been rated as ‘Good’ at their previous inspection (report published on 20 November 2018). The provider had recently added the ‘supported living’ service type to their CQC registration details for this location. We therefore carried out this inspection because the supported living part of the service had not yet been rated. This inspection was carried out by one inspector.

We gave the provider 24 hours’ notice of our inspection. This was because we needed to ensure the registered manager would be available to meet with the inspector at the provider’s office.

At the time of this inspection, 3 people received supported living support from this provider. However, only 2 people received the regulated activity of personal care. We therefore only reviewed the specific care plans relating to those 2 people, but we did inspect the general staffing, and management arrangements in place.

The provider had a learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. Staff understood and managed risks well when they supported people. There were enough staff with the right skills, knowledge, and experience to meet people’s needs. Staff had received relevant training. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Staff managed people’s prescribed medicines well.

People were involved in deciding how they individually received care. People’s person-centred care plans and risk assessments took account of their individual communication needs as well as their personal care and health care needs. Staff monitored people’s health, where required, to encourage healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff ensured an appropriate best interest decision making process was followed where people did not have the capacity to make decisions for themselves.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff treated people as individuals and protected their privacy and dignity.

The registered manager was working to create a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning, and trust. The registered manager was knowledgeable, they treated staff fairly and respected their wellbeing. The registered manager collaborated with the community healthcare teams to ensure people received consistent and effective healthcare support. There was a culture of continuous improvement and of learning lessons from incidents to help reduce reoccurrences.

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 12 February 2026 to 25 February 2026.

Cera-Derbyshire is a homecare service which provides personal care for people with a learning disability, autistic people, and adults of all ages who may have dementia, sensory impairments, or physical disability. Nursing care was not provided to people by this service.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The service had been rated as ‘Good’ at their previous inspection (report published on 20 November 2018), and we carried out this inspection because it was an aged rating. This inspection was carried out by one inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

We gave the provider 24 hours’ notice of our inspection. This was because we needed to ensure the registered manager would be available to meet with the inspector at the provider’s office. We also received feedback from 11 of the provider’s care staff.

At the time of this inspection, 67 people received support from this provider. However, only 43 people received the regulated activity of personal care. We therefore only reviewed the specific care provided to those 43 people, but we did inspect the general staffing, and management arrangements in place.

The provider had a learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. Staff understood and managed risks well when they visited people. There were enough staff with the right skills, knowledge, and experience to meet people’s needs. Staff had received relevant training. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Staff managed people’s prescribed medicines well.

People were involved in deciding how they individually received care. People’s person-centred care plans and risk assessments took account of their individual communication needs as well as their personal care and health care needs. Staff monitored people’s health, where required, to encourage healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff ensured an appropriate best interest decision making process was followed where people did not have the capacity to make decisions for themselves.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff treated people as individuals and protected their privacy and dignity.

The registered manager was working to create a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning, and trust. The registered manager was knowledgeable, they treated staff fairly and respected their wellbeing. The registered manager collaborated with the community healthcare teams to ensure people received consistent and effective healthcare support. There was a culture of continuous improvement and of learning lessons from incidents to help reduce re-occurrences.

25 September 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection of the service on 25 September 2018. Mears Care Chapel en le Frith is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats. It currently provides a service to older and younger adults. Not everyone using the service receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the time of the inspection, 150 people received some element of support with their personal care. This is the service’s first inspection under its current registration.

People felt staff supported them safely and protected them from avoidable harm. The risks to people’s safety were appropriately assessed and acted on. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs and people told us staff mainly attended calls on time. People’s medicines were managed safely and staff understood how to reduce the risk of the spread of infection. The provider had processes in place to investigate accidents and incidents and to learn from mistakes.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service support this practice. People’s care was provided in line with current legislation and best practice guidelines.

People felt staff were well trained and understood how to support them. Where needed, people received effective support from staff with their meals. People had access to other health and social care agencies when professional input was needed.

People liked the staff and found them to be kind, caring and respectful, and they always treated them with dignity during personal care. People were involved with decisions about their care and felt staff listened to and acted on their wishes. Independence was encouraged and people’s records were stored safely and in line with data protection legislation.

People were assessed before joining the service to ensure their needs could be met. Where appropriate, people were supported by staff with their hobbies and interests. People’s care records were person centred and people told us they received their care in their preferred way. People’s diverse needs were discussed with them and respected. People had not felt the need to make a formal complaint, however we saw appropriate action had been taken by the registered manager where needed. Efforts had been made to discuss end of life care with people, however records relating to this element of care required more detail.

The service was well-led by a respected and well liked registered manager. They had the support of their provider to develop and improve the service as well as supporting social inclusion. This included supporting people to become involved with their local community. Staff felt valued with high-quality performance rewarded. Auditing processes were in place. The provider supported the registered manager to carry out their role effectively and held them to account.