• Care Home
  • Care home

Park View Residential Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

416 Sicey Avenue, Shiregreen, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S5 0EN (0114) 257 2910

Provided and run by:
Sanctuary Care Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Our view of the service

About the service

Park View Residential Care Home is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 60 people. At the time of our inspection there were 52 people living at the service. Accommodation is provided over two floors, accessed by a lift.

Who the service is for

The service supports older people, younger people and people living with dementia.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 28 September 2016. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

We found some areas where improvements were required to ensure the home maintained appropriate infection prevention and control, environmental safety and improvements to governance systems to ensure issues were consistently identified and addressed. Following our inspection the registered manager took swift action to improve the service.

Risks associated with people’s care were identified and managed to keep people safe. Risk assessments and care plans were detailed and care was delivered in line with them. Staff were recruited safely and received training and support to carry out their role effectively. Staff told us they felt supported and received regular supervision sessions with their line manager. People were safeguarded from the risk of abuse and staff knew what action to take if they suspected abuse. One staff member said, “If I suspected any kind of abuse, I would report it immediately and I feel it would be taken serious and they [management team] will follow it up.” Accidents and incidents were recorded and reviewed to ensure trends and patterns were identified to improve practice. Lessons learnt exercises were completed and shared with staff. People received their medicines as prescribed by staff who were trained and competent in the safe administration of medicines.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

People’s needs were assessed and care was delivered in line with them. Care plans and risk assessments were reviewed monthly to ensure they reflected any changes in care delivery. People received sufficient food and hydration to maintain a healthy balanced diet. Modified diets were provided for people who required them and staff assisted people with food and drinks as appropriate. People had access to healthcare professionals as required and staff told us they had good working relationships with external professionals. One external professional said, “Management and staff have been happy to sit and talk and give updates on clients and how they have been. I have found them honest in their feedback which helps and supports me in being able to have honest discussions with client’s family members when looking at future support for clients, how best to support care and support needs, maintain independence, and support health, wellbeing and safety.”

Consent forms were documented in care plans such as consent to information and photography sharing, and care plan involvement. We saw people were offered choices and staff respected their decision, such as what they wanted to eat, drink and where they wanted to sit.

Staff were kind, caring and understanding of people’s needs. Staff promoted people’s independence and there was a range of different sitting areas where people could choose to sit. The home had a garden area, although independent access to this could be improved. The home had achieved the Veteran Friendly Framework (VFF) status, which aims to better support the practical, emotional and social needs of the armed forces community living in care homes. They told us, “Park View has consistently shown a positive, proactive approach when engaging with our veteran community. Communication with the service is always respectful, timely, and collaborative. When we provide guidance or suggestions particularly around veteran engagement, wellbeing activities, or community inclusion. The staff and management respond constructively and follow through on agreed actions.” People had access to activity co-ordinators who provided a range of social activities, events and stimulation.

The provider had a complaints procedure which was displayed in the home. The registered manager investigated complaints in line with their policy and took action to learn from them. People had several opportunities to voice their opinions about the service such as meetings, quality questionnaires and suggestion boxes. People's goals and outcomes were recorded and monitored in people's care plans.

The management team promoted the provider’s values throughout the service and made it their mission to enrich people’s lives. The provider’s values were based on 6 senses, the sense of security, belonging, continuity, purpose, achievement and significance. The management team worked well together to support staff. They completed a range of audits on a monthly basis to ensure the service was working in line with the providers expectations. However, some further work was required to ensure audits identified issues swiftly so appropriate actions could be taken.

5 November 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Park View is a care home providing accommodation and personal care to older people, some of whom are living with dementia. The service can support up to 60 people across four separate units in one adapted building. At the time of this inspection there were 59 people living at Park View.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People and their relatives spoke positively about all the staff. A relative told us, “I can go home happy knowing my relative is well looked after and cared for."

There were enough staff available to ensure people’s care and support needs were met. There were effective recruitment procedures in place to make sure staff had the required skills and were of suitable character and background. Medicines were stored safely and securely. Where people needed support with managing their medicines there were systems in place to ensure people received their medicines as prescribed.

Staff were provided with an effective induction and relevant training to make sure they had the right skills and knowledge for their role. Staff were supported in their jobs through regular supervisions and an annual appraisal.

Staff understood the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were supported to eat and drink to maintain a balanced diet. People were supported to maintain good health and have access to health and social care services.

Positive and supportive relationships had been developed between people, their relatives and staff. People were treated with dignity and respect throughout the day of the inspection. There were activities available to people living at Park View.

People, their relatives and staff were asked for their views of the service. They told us the registered manager and staff were approachable and responsive to any issues raised. There were effective systems in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service provided. The service had policies and procedures which reflected current legislation and good practice guidance.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 22 April 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

20 March 2017

During a routine inspection

Park View Care Home is purpose built and registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to 60 older people, some of whom are living with dementia. The home is located in a residential area with access to public services and amenities.

There was a manager at the service who was registered with CQC. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our last inspection at Park View took place on 9 February 2015. We found a breach in the regulations of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, in regard to regulation 18; Staffing. The registered provider sent an action plan detailing how they were going to make improvements. At this inspection we checked improvements the registered provider had made. We found sufficient improvements had been made to meet the requirements of Regulation 18: Staffing, as staff had been provided with training, supervisions and appraisals at the frequency set out in the registered provider’s policy. Whilst staff verbally confirmed they had been provided with supervision, we found some supervisions had not been formally recorded to fully evidence they had taken place.

This inspection took place on 8 March 2017 and was unannounced. This meant the people who lived at Park View and the staff who worked there did not know we were coming. On the day of our inspection there were 58 people living at Park View.

People living at Park View and their relatives spoken with were positive about their experience of living at or visiting Park View. They told us they, or their family member, felt safe and they liked the staff.

We found systems were in place to make sure people received their medicines safely so their health was looked after.

Staff recruitment procedures ensured people’s safety was promoted.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the registered provider’s policies and systems supported this practice.

People had access to a range of health care professionals to help maintain their health. A varied diet was provided, which took into account dietary needs and preferences so people’s health was promoted and choices could be respected.

Staff knew people well and positive, caring relationships had been developed. People were encouraged to express their views and they were involved in decisions about their care. People’s privacy and dignity were respected and promoted. Staff understood how to support people in a sensitive way.

A programme of activities was in place so people were provided with a range of leisure opportunities.

People said they could speak with staff if they had any worries or concerns and they would be listened to.

There were effective systems in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service provided. Regular checks and audits were undertaken to make sure full and safe procedures were adhered to.

09 February 2015

During a routine inspection

Park View Care Home is purpose built and registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to 60 older people, some of whom are living with dementia. Accommodation is provided over two floors. A passenger lift is available and all areas of the home are accessible. All of the bedrooms are single and have en-suite toilets and showers. Each floor provides communal lounges and dining rooms. The home has an enclosed garden and a car park.

There was a manager at the service who was registered with CQC. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our last inspection at Park View Care Home took place on 27 June 2013. The home was found to be meeting the requirements of the regulations we inspected at that time.

This inspection took place on 9 February 2015 and was unannounced, which meant the service did not know we would be visiting. On the day of our inspection there were 54 people living at Park View Care Home.

People told us they were well cared for by staff that knew them well, and they felt safe. Every person spoken with told us they were ‘happy’ living at Park View Care Home.

Relatives told us they had no worries or concerns about the care provided.

We found systems were in place to make sure people received their medication safely.

Staff were provided with relevant induction and some training to make sure they had the right skills and knowledge for their role. Staff understood their role and what was expected of them. The service followed the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of practice and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. However, staff were not provided with training in this area and showed a lack of understanding regarding the MCA. This did not help to protect the rights of people who may not be able to make important decisions themselves.

Staff had not received supervision in line with the service’s own procedure.

People had access to a range of health care professionals to help maintain their health. A varied and nutritious diet was provided to people that took into account dietary needs and preferences so that health was promoted and choices could be respected.

People living at the home, and their relatives said that they could speak with staff if they had any worries or concerns and they would be listened to.

We saw people participated in a range of daily activities both in and outside of the home which were meaningful and promoted independence.

There were effective systems in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service provided. Regular checks and audits were undertaken to make sure full and safe procedures were adhered to. People using the service and their relatives had been asked their opinion via surveys, the results of these had been audited to identify any areas for improvement.

We found one breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

27 June 2013

During a routine inspection

People's needs were assessed and care was planned in line with their individual needs. People and their representatives were involved in the planning of their care and the subsequent reviews. One relative said 'We are always invited by staff and if we weren't able to attend they let us know what happened at the review.'

Health, safety and welfare of people were protected when outside agencies were involved in their care and treatment. This was because the provider worked in co-operation with other professionals.

People were protected from the risk of infection because appropriate guidance had been followed by staff at the home. We noticed staff using personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately. Two relatives said when they visited the home; it always looked clean and smelt fresh.

People were protected against the risks associated with medicines because appropriate arrangements were in place. Staff dealing with medicine had completed training and refresher courses to ensure competence.

There was an effective recruitment and selection policy in place. The manager had followed the company policy correctly when recruiting staff.

People we spoke with said that if they had a complaint they would talk to any member of staff or the manager. They said they felt confident that it would be 'sorted out'. No one expressed any concerns about raising complaints. One person said 'Well, I could tell anyone, and they'd sort it out, but I haven't got any complaints'.

30 May 2012

During a routine inspection

People with dementia are not always able to tell us about their experiences, so we have used a formal way to observe people in this inspection to help us understand. We call this the 'Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). This involved us observing people who use services for a period of time and recording their experiences at regular intervals. This includes people's mood, and how they interacted with staff members, other people who use services, visitors and the environment.

Those who were able to communicate with us made the following comments to say how they felt about the service they received and the staff who cared for them.

'They are lovely here.' 'The food is lovely can't complain.'

'I can have what I want at meal times. I don't like too much food on my plate. The care staff are good.'

'I am very happy here. I can go to the shops if I want.'

'We have activities and if we want we can join in. I would rather watch them dance than to join in.'

People made positive comments about the staff attitude and the care they received.