• Care Home
  • Care home

Greville House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

40 Streetly Lane, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, B74 4TU (0121) 308 8304

Provided and run by:
Greville House Care Home Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 21 July 2026

Date of Assessment: 11 August to 1 September 2026. Greville House is a residential home providing care and support for up to 25 older adults. At the time of the assessment 23 people were living at the home. We carried out the assessment due to the age of the previous rating.

People had positive experiences of living at Greville House. People received kind, compassionate and person-centred care from a stable staff team who knew them well and respected their dignity, preferences and independence. People and relatives consistently praised the staff, describing the home as welcoming and family-like. People were supported to maintain relationships, participate in activities that interested them and make choices about their daily lives.

People felt safe and relatives were confident that staff communicated with them when concerns arose. There were enough suitably recruited and trained staff to meet people’s needs, and staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities. People received their daily medicines from trained staff.

People’s health and wellbeing needs were assessed and monitored, with good access to healthcare professionals and strong links with the local GP practice. People enjoyed meals that reflected their preferences and dietary needs. Staff sought prompt support from healthcare professionals which had contributed to improved health outcomes for people.

People’s communication and accessibility needs were identified. People could give feedback, raise concerns and contribute with suggestions for improvement by attending regular resident’s meetings led by the management team.

The service was well managed and had an open, compassionate culture. Governance systems monitored the quality and safety of care, and the registered manager responded promptly when improvements were identified. However, we identified some areas where monitoring systems, oversight and records could be strengthened. This included concerns around some aspects of environmental safety, medicines management of ‘as required’ medications and ensuring records clearly demonstrated people's involvement in care planning and reviews. The registered manager responded promptly to the issues identified and took immediate action to address them.

People's experience of the service

Updated 21 July 2026

People living at Greville House told us they were happy living at the home and described staff as kind, caring and respectful. Throughout our visit we observed warm and positive interactions between staff and people using the service. Staff knew people well, understood their preferences and supported them in ways that promoted dignity, choice and independence. People were encouraged to make decisions about their daily lives and participate in activities that reflected their interests. Families told us their relatives were treated with compassion and that the home had a welcoming, family atmosphere. One relative told us, “[Greville House] is fantastic and feels like a family.”

People felt safe and relatives told us staff responded promptly when support was needed. Relatives described good communication from the management team, particularly when people's health needs changed. People benefited from a stable staff team who worked well together and knew people well. One relative told us, “[Person] loves the staff. They look after her well. They are so kind.” People received support to maintain relationships with family and friends and were supported to access healthcare services when required.

People were supported to achieve outcomes that were important to them. Care was tailored to individual needs, preferences and communication requirements, and people had access to equipment and adaptations that promoted independence. People enjoyed home-cooked meals, opportunities for social engagement and support to remain as independent as possible. People told us they felt listened to and knew how to raise any concerns or share their views about the service.

People experienced caring, person-centred support from a staff team and management team who were committed to promoting safety, wellbeing, independence and positive outcomes. The culture within the home was open, compassionate and focused on helping people live fulfilled lives.