• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Dr Sandeep Bolia Private Medical Services

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

203m Camberwell Grove, London, SE5 8JU

Provided and run by:
Dr Sandeep Bolia Private Medical Services

Report from 12 June 2025 assessment

On this page

Well-led

Good

26 September 2025

We looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture

At our last assessment, this key question was unrated. At this assessment, the rating is good.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of patients and their communities.

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively.

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The service employed only one member of staff who was both the clinical lead and the provider. The provider was aware of best practice in the event that further staff were employed.

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The service employed only one member of staff who was both the clinical lead and the provider.

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 3

The service had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They act on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and share this securely with others when appropriate. There were clear clinical and operational governance procedures at the service.

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The service clearly understood and carried out their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, and services worked seamlessly for patients. They always share information and learning with partners and collaborate for improvement.

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for patients. They actively contribute to safe, effective practice and research.