• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Richard Norman Care Coordinators

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

40 Dennett Road, Croydon, CR0 3JA (020) 8528 3339

Provided and run by:
Richard Norman Care Coordinators Ltd

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 13 July 2019

The inspection:

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team:

This inspection was carried out by one inspector.

Service and service type:

Richard Norman Care Coordinators is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. It provides this service to older and younger adults, some of whom presented with physical disabilities.

The service is required to have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. At the time of our inspection, a manager was registered with us.

Notice of inspection:

We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because it is small and the manager is often out of the office supporting staff or providing care. We needed to be sure that they would be in.

What we did:

Before our inspection we reviewed information we held about the service. This included notifications the provider is required by law to send us about events that happen within the service. We used information the provider sent us in the Provider Information Return. This is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.

During our inspection we spoke with two people, one relative, two staff and the registered manager. We reviewed the care records of five people and files of three staff which included recruitment, supervision and training records. We also reviewed records related to the management of the service.

After the inspection we requested additional information about the provider’s quality audits from the registered manager and contacted two health and social care professionals for their views regarding the care and support being provided to people.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 13 July 2019

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team:

This inspection was carried out by one inspector.

Service and service type:

Richard Norman Care Coordinators is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. It provides this service to older and younger adults, some of whom presented with physical disabilities. The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection:

We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because it is small and the manager is often out of the office supporting staff or providing care. We needed to be sure that they would be in.

What we did: before the inspection

We reviewed information we held about the service. This included notifications the provider is required by law to send us about events that happen within the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections.

During our inspection

We spoke with two people, one relative, two staff and the registered manager. We reviewed the care records of five people and files of three staff which included recruitment, supervision and training records. We also reviewed records related to the management of the service.

After the inspection

We requested additional information about the provider’s quality audits from the registered manager and contacted two health and social care professionals for their views regarding the care and support being provided to people.