• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Professional Care Support Services Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Access House, 141 Morden Road, Mitcham, Surrey, CR4 4DG (020) 8286 9177

Provided and run by:
Professional Care Support Services Ltd

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 23 to 25 February 2026.

Professional Care Support Services Ltd is a home care agency providing personal care and support to people living in their own home. At the time of this assessment, 19 people were receiving personal care from this provider.

The last rating for this service was good (published October 2019). A comprehensive assessment was undertaken looking at all quality statements under the 5 key questions. It was conducted due to the length of time since our last rating. Following this assessment, the service remains good.

An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is registered for use by autistic people or people with a learning disability. At the time of the assessment, the service was not used by anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.

Systems and processes enabled safe care delivery, and there was a clear commitment to maintaining and improving standards. People were protected from avoidable harm. Risk assessments were thorough, personalised and regularly reviewed. Staff understood how to raise safeguarding concerns. Care was delivered by staff recruited safely, and training records showed they had completed required training relevant to their roles. People received continuity of care from staff who were familiar with their needs, preferences and daily routines. Staff arrived on time for their home visits and always completed all the tasks they were expected to within the agreed timeframes as set out in their care plan. Staff used personal protective equipment appropriately, and spot checks confirmed safe infection prevention and control practice.

People’s needs were assessed before care began, and the managers and supervisors collaborated with the person to develop a detailed care plan. The manager’s clinical knowledge contributed to the delivery of safe, informed care, and staff received ongoing guidance. People were involved in decisions about their care and confirmed staff always sought their consent.

Staff were caring and treated people with dignity and respect. Staff were attentive to personal preferences in how care and support was provided.

Care plans were personalised, flexible and updated in response to changes in the person’s needs. Staff adapted support quickly when the person became unwell. The provider encouraged feedback, acted on concerns, and managed complaints appropriately.

The registered manager promoted an open and supportive culture and maintained clear oversight of care quality through spot checks, audits, reviews and regular communication with staff and the person. Staff described leadership as approachable and inclusive. Governance arrangements were effective, and the provider demonstrated an ongoing commitment to learning, improvement and developing the service further.

23 September 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Professional Care Support Services Ltd is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people aged 65 and over. At the time of the inspection 31 people were receiving care from the service.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

At the time of inspection we found that some improvements were needed to ensure staff recruitment files reflected their employment history. The provider took immediate action to remedy this following our inspection. Staff knew how to report potential safeguarding concerns. People received their medicines safely and suitable risk assessments were in place to mitigate risks to people. Effective measures continued to prevent the spread of infection.

People and relatives felt that the care delivered was responsive to their needs. We recommend the provider ensure that people’s care records fully reflect their preferences. The provider took appropriate steps to support people requiring end of life care. No complaints had been received at the time of our inspection.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People were supported to access other healthcare professionals, as well as staff taking steps to support their eating and drinking needs. Staff were supported through regular training, supervision and appraisal.

Staff ensured they were kind, caring and respectful towards the people they visited. People were supported to be as independent as they were able to, and staff respected their privacy and dignity. People and relatives were consulted in relation to their care needs.

The registered manager was thought of positively, and ensured they were accessible to people, relatives and staff. Quality assurance systems were in place to review service provision and drive improvements.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good (published 10 May 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

13 April 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 13 April 2017. We carried out a focussed inspection on 21 April 2016 following a comprehensive inspection in September 2015 at which four breaches of regulations were found. These were because the provider had not suitably assessed and managed some risks to people and they had followed safe recruitment procedures. In addition to this there was inconsistent understanding by staff of people’s capacity to make decisions and their right to give consent to the care they received. Quality assurance methodology also needed developing. As a result the provider was rated as requiring improvement. At the focussed inspection in April 2016 we found the provider had addressed all the breaches of regulations we had previously found.. However we did not change the ratings in April 2016 because we wanted to ensure the improvements made were well established. At this inspection we found the provider met the regulations and we have changed the rating of the service as a result to ‘Good’.

Professional Care Support Services provides personal care and support to people in their own homes in Merton and Wandsworth. The people who used the service included older people and people with a learning disability or a physical disability. On the day of our inspection fourteen people were using the service.

At the time of the inspection, there was a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe and were supported by staff who knew how to keep them safe. The provider had arrangements to help ensure that risks to people's health and safety were assessed and well managed by staff.

People were supported by appropriate numbers of staff. Appropriate staff recruitment procedures helped to keep people safe.

People received the support they needed to safely manage their medicines.

Staff had the knowledge and skills to care for people effectively and felt well supported by appropriate training and effective supervision.

People were all able to make choices and decisions about their care sometimes with the support of their relatives.

People received support where they needed it to have enough to eat and drink and to access a range of healthcare services.

People told us staff knew them well and were kind and caring towards them. It was evident staff had established positive relationships with people. People also said staff valued people, treated them with respect and promoted their rights, choice and independence.

People said staff who supported them had up to date information about their needs and this was delivered in the way they wanted. We found there was consistency in the provision of care for people and this enabled caring relationships to be developed.

People and their relatives told us they were involved in the planning and reviewing of their care. There was a clear plan of care available for staff who supported people according to their needs and wishes.

People were provided with support that was responsive to their changing needs.

People knew about and were able to make a complaint and were confident the provider would respond appropriately to any concerns they might have.

The registered manager had implemented a variety of methods to assess and monitor the quality of the service. These included satisfaction surveys, spot check and care reviews. We found people were satisfied with the service they received. All the records we inspected were clear, easy to access and logically filed. This reflected on a well organised and efficiently run domiciliary care service.