• Dentist
  • Dentist

VitaSmile

First Floor, 66 Station Road, London, NW10 4UA (020) 8453 1815

Provided and run by:
Vita Smile Ltd

Important:

We served warning notices on Vita Smile Ltd on 2 April 2026 for failing to meet the regulations related to safe care and treatment, safeguarding, staffing, fit and proper persons employed, and good governance at VitaSmile.

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

We carried out this announced on-site inspection on 20 March 2026.

We found the practice had not met all regulations.

The practice infection control procedures did not reflect published guidance.

The practice did not have systems to identify, assess, and manage risks to patients and staff.

The practice recruitment procedures did not reflect current legislation.

The practice did not have robust safeguarding processes, and staff did not know their responsibilities for safeguarding.

The practice did not have effective systems to ensure staff received appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisals.

There was a lack of effective leadership or culture of continuous improvement.

While medical emergency medicines were available in line with relevant guidance, staff did not know how to deal with medical emergencies.

Improvements were required to ensure that treatment provided to patients was adequately documented in the patient care records.

Staff provided care and treatment in line with current guidance. They treated patients with dignity and respect and ensured access to care, support, and treatment when required.

The practice is in the London Borough of Brent and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children. Services are provided primarily to Brazilian patients, however all nationalities are welcome.

There was a staircase at the entrance, which meant the practice was not accessible to wheelchair users. Patients were informed of this when contacting the practice and were signposted to a nearby practice that was accessible to wheelchair users. Off-street parking and public transport services were available near the practice.

The practice had 3 treatment rooms. At the time of our inspection, there was a total of 14 staff, of which there was the principal dentist, who was also the registered manager, 7 associate dentists, 3 trainee nurses, 1 dental therapist, 1 receptionist and the practice manager. We gathered feedback from staff and spoke to a range of staff during our inspection, including the principal dentist, 2 trainee dental nurses, 1 associate dentist, the receptionist, the practice manager and the external compliance consultant.

The provider was not complying with regulations 12 (Safe care and treatment), 13 (Safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment), 17 (Good governance), 18 (Staffing) and 19 (Fit and proper persons employed) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are within the inspection report.

In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

9 May 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 9 May 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Vitasmile is in the London Borough of Brent and provides private treatment to adults and children. Services are provided primarily to Brazilian patients, however all nationalities are welcome.

The dental team includes a principal dentist, four dentists, one qualified dental nurse, three trainee dental nurses, two receptionists and a practice manager.

The practice is owned by an organisation and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Vitasmile was the principal dentist.

On the day of inspection we collected 23 CQC comment cards filled in by patients.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, two dental nurses, receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

  • Monday to Saturday 9am to 8pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The practice was providing preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The practice had suitable information governance arrangements.