• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Fun and Breaks( Mid Sussex, Crawley and Horsham)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

CDTN Floor 4, County Hall, North Chart Way, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1XH (01403) 229781

Provided and run by:
West Sussex County Council

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

6 January 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 6 January 2015 and was an announced inspection.

The Fun and Breaks (FAB) service provides short breaks for children and young people with a range of disabilities, for example, autism, physical and/or learning disability and communication difficulties, from birth to the age of 18 years. The service is for disabled children who are in receipt of middle or high rate Disability Living Allowance. Disability Living Allowance (DLA) is money for children who have care needs or mobility needs. It is run by West Sussex County Council and receives additional funding from government. Volunteers are recruited to provide support for children either at their family home or out in the community. They will volunteer for at least two hours per week and, apart from expenses, are unpaid. Volunteers are trained by the service. The short breaks provided to children or young people enables families to spend time together away from the child, for example, as a couple or with their other children. Additionally, it enables the child to become more independent and confident as they are supported by their volunteer in the community.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Relatives felt their family members were safe as they were supported by volunteers on a short break. Risks were assessed so that volunteers knew how to look after children and young people. Any accidents or incidents were reported formally through the completion of diary sheets after every short break. Volunteers knew about safeguarding procedures, what to do if they suspected abuse was happening and had received child protection training. Safe recruitments practices were followed and all necessary checks had been undertaken when new volunteers were recruited, to ensure they were safe to work with children and young people. Volunteers carried information about the child they supported when they were out in the community. This enabled them to share vital information to be shared with the emergency services, should this be required. Volunteers did not administer medicines as this was not their responsibility.

Volunteers were carefully matched with families, children and young people. The service established the preferences, likes and dislikes of the child or young person and then looked at the profile of new volunteers to see who would work best together. When volunteers were matched with families, they agreed together the number of hours’ support and when it would be convenient to have a short break. Volunteers received training as part of their induction programme and this was refreshed annually. They received regular one to one meetings throughout the year from the registered manager, either face to face, by ‘phone or through email. The registered manager had also received training that was relevant to her role. Consent to care was provided by family carers, since the children and young people using the service, were under the age of consent.

Positive, caring relationships had been developed between the volunteers, the children or young people and their families. These relationships were developed slowly so that people had time to get to know each other. The child or young person was part of the process and they made choices about how they wanted to spend the time with their volunteer.

Short breaks were organised either in the family home or outside in the community. Children and young people were interested in being supported in a variety of activities, for example, visiting a garden centre to see the animals, attending a karate class or having a meal at McDonalds. Volunteers’ interests and hobbies were matched with the interests of the child. Care plans were drawn up that provided information about the child to enable the volunteer to deliver appropriate support. These plans were reviewed regularly with families. Complaints were dealt with in line with the provider’s policy and addressed promptly. No formal complaints had been made recently.

The registered manager had sent out questionnaires to families, children and young people. Feedback was positive and the results had been analysed and outcomes acted upon. The service sent out a newsletter every six months which provided updates about the service and useful contacts. Events were held for volunteers to thank them for their contribution; events were held for parents and carers too. Steering groups were organised where volunteers, parents and carers could feedback any issues to local authority representatives. Registered managers from the other FAB schemes in the county met regularly and the service worked in partnership with relevant professionals, organisations and charities.

4 November 2013

During a routine inspection

At the time of our visit 26 families were receiving ongoing support from the service and over twenty families were waiting for a suitable volunteer to be identified.

We spoke with four parents, three volunteers and the co-ordinator and looked at care records and volunteer files.

Everyone we spoke with said they were satisfied with the service provided. People told us they had been fully informed about the service before accepting it and their needs and preferences had been taken into account when selecting their volunteer carer and planning their care and support. We looked at a selection of written comments and one person wrote 'All of us have benefitted from our volunteer and the massive change they have made to our lives. We are less stressed as a family, and that in turn has made everyone happier'.

People told us that they felt safe with their volunteers and we found that volunteers were aware of safeguarding issues relevant to their role.The provider took appropriate action to safeguard people against abuse.

The service had an effective volunteer recruitment and selection process and volunteers were appropriately trained to deliver care and support safely.

Fun and Breaks undertook regular questionnaires with people who used the service, volunteers and other stakeholders, and had a range of other quality assurance systems in place to monitor and develop the service being provided in line with the identified needs and wishes of people using the service.

5 March 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke to the parents and carers of the children who used the service. They told us they were happy with the care and service they received. One parent told us 'I really like the volunteer we have, at the moment I couldn't be happier.'

We found people views and experiences were taken in account by the way they were cared for by volunteers working at the agency. The provider told us before service was provided people were assessed to determine their needs and the level of support required. People where possible and their parents or carers participated in these assessments and gave their views on their preferences and how they wanted to be treated.

The provider told us people who used the service had a volunteer who worked with them continuously. The provider told us this meant volunteers were able to build relationships with families. Parents we spoke to told us it was important to build relationships with their volunteers. This meant volunteers understood people and their family dynamics and were able to appropriately support people with the care they needed.

Volunteers told us they received training and adequate support for their roles. They reported they were happy and agreed that matching volunteers to families was a key role to ensure success of the service provided. The parents we spoke to told us they were happy with volunteers who worked with their families.

The provider had a system to monitor and assess the quality of the service people received.