• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Tarrant Street Clinic

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

40A Tarrant Street, Arundel, West Sussex, BN18 9DN

Provided and run by:
Arundel Clinic Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Tarrant Street Clinic on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Tarrant Street Clinic, you can give feedback on this service.

15 November 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Tarrant Street Clinic on 15 November 2019 as part of our inspection programme, under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008. This was the provider’s first rated inspection. The practice was previously inspected in October 2018 when the practice was not rated but was found to be meeting all regulations.

Tarrant Street Clinic is an independent provider of specialist consultant-led dermatology services, located in Arundel, West Sussex.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of regulated activities and services and these are set out in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Tarrant Street Clinic provides a range of specialist dermatological aesthetics services, for example Dermapen and photodynamic therapy, which are not within CQC scope of registration. Therefore, we did not inspect or report on these services.

The practice is registered with the Care Quality Commission to provide the following regulated activities: Diagnostic and screening procedures; Treatment of disease, disorder or injury; Surgical procedures.

There are two managing partners and clinical services are provided by one partner who is a consultant dermatologist and the medical director for the service.

The second managing partner is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We received written and verbal feedback about the practice from 25 patients on the day of inspection. Feedback from patients was positive about the service and care provided. Patients described the service as being caring, respectful and professional. Several patients commented upon the excellence in clinical care afforded to them.

Our key findings were :

  • Staff had high levels of skills, knowledge and experience to deliver the care and treatment offered by the service.
  • Services were offered on a private, fee paying basis only.
  • Facilities were of a high standard and were well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • Patients were provided with detailed treatment plans to support their care and treatment.
  • Patients received full and detailed explanations of any treatment options.
  • The service had systems in place to promote the reporting of incidents.
  • There were infection prevention and control policies and procedures in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection.
  • The service encouraged and valued feedback from patients and staff. Feedback from patients was highly positive.
  • The provider had clear systems and processes in place to ensure care was delivered safely and good governance and management was supported.
  • The service completed a number of clinical and non-clinical audits to assess performance and ensure care provided was safe.
  • There was a focus upon continuous improvement and exploration of innovations in treatment to achieve optimum outcomes for patients.
  • The provider shared their specialist knowledge with the wider community through journals, attending education events and training and networking with other clinical professionals.
  • The culture of the service encouraged candour, openness and honesty.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • To ensure that all infection prevention and control processes and procedures are subject to regular audit.
  • Review accessibility and version control of organisational policies stored electronically to ensure staff have access to up to date guidance.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

3 October 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 3 October 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

Dr Sebastian Cummins is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of regulated activities and services and these are set out in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Tarrant Street Clinic provides a range of non surgical cosmetic interventions, for example Dermapen and phototherapy which are not within CQC scope of registration. Therefore, we did not inspect or report on these services.

19 patients provided feedback about the service. All the feedback we received was positive about the care and treatment received. Patients found the service to be professional, caring, supportive and maintained the privacy and dignity of patients at all times.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
  • Patients were provided with detailed treatment plans to support their care and treatment.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Recruitment practices ensures information required by regulation was in place prior to the appointment of staff.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the information contained in the complaints procedure to add details of an appropriate body to refer complaints to as the next step if the complainant is unhappy with the practice’s response.
  • Complete the update of the practice’s infection control audit and include the rationale/risk assessment for the legionella testing.
  • Review the practice information to take account of access for people with limited mobility.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice