• Dentist
  • Dentist

Jerry Kwok Dental Surgery

Aysgarth, Manor Park Road, Chislehurst, Kent, BR7 5PY

Provided and run by:
Mr. Jerry Kwok

All Inspections

7 February 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced inspection on 7 February 2022 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment,

we usually ask five key questions; however, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Background

Jerry Kwok Dental Practice is in Chislehurst, the London Borough of Bromley and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children. Car parking spaces are available near the practice.

The dental team includes two dentists and one dental nurse. The practice has one treatment room.

During the inspection we spoke with a dentist and a dental nurse. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday 9.30am to 4pm.

Tuesday and Wednesday 2.30pm to 5pm.

Friday 9am to 4pm.

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Most medicines and life-saving equipment were available. However, there was some room for improvement.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation. However, improvements were required in regard to the employment checks undertaken.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement. There was scope to improve elements of the audit processes.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure a disability access audit is undertaken and that audits of infection prevention and control are undertaken at regular intervals to improve the quality of the service.

  • Implement a system to ensure patient referrals to other dental or health care professionals are centrally monitored to ensure they are received in a timely manner and not lost.

  • Take action to ensure the availability of equipment in the practice to manage medical emergencies taking into account the guidelines issued by the British National Formulary and the General Dental Council.

  • Take action to ensure the service takes into account the needs of patients with disabilities and to comply with the requirements of the Equality Act 2010.

4 June 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

People we spoke with were very complimentary about the service they received. They praised the quality and responsiveness of the service and reported no concerns. One person said 'I couldn't find any fault whatsoever, the dentist is fantastic', and another person said 'excellent service and content'. Everyone we spoke with felt very involved in making informed decisions about their treatment and care. They said they found the dental practice to be clean and hygienic when they visited.

We found that the provider planned treatment and care that met people's needs and people were protected from the risks of infection. Management and staff records were maintained appropriately and securely. Staff were supported with their professional development.

7 February 2013

During a routine inspection

We were unable to speak to people who use the service as none were scheduled to be seen at the time of the inspection. We were told that patient surveys were not carried out but many people who used the service sent letters or cards to the provider thanking him for his kind treatment. We were not able to see evidence of this at the inspection. We found the surgery to be cluttered and surfaces could not be effectively cleaned.

Care and treatment was planned but not delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare. The arrangements to deal with foreseeable emergencies were not robust and the decontamination arrangements did not meet national guidance. The provider had not assessed the risks of infection prevention and control in the service.