• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: RHR Medical Centre

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Calverton Drive, Strelley, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG8 6QN (0115) 979 7910

Provided and run by:
JRB Healthcare

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

8 Jan 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focussed inspection of RHR Medical Centre on the 8th January 2020. This inspection was undertaken to follow up on breaches of regulations which had been identified at our previous inspection in October 2019 in relation to governance, therefore the practice was not rated at this inspection.

The warning notice that we issued in October 2019 required the practice to achieve compliance with the regulations by the 10th December 2019.

The practice is currently rated as Requires Improvement which remains unchanged until we undertake a full comprehensive inspection of the practice.

Previous reports for this provider can be accessed on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

At this inspection we found that the requirements of the warning notice had been fully met.

Our key findings across the areas that we inspected for this focussed inspection were as follows:

  • There was a system to ensure that patients requiring appointments were assessed and directed to an appropriate service if they were not able to be seen within the practice.
  • We saw evidence of accurate, complete and comprehensive records on patient’s clinical records. There were complete audit trails to follow for patient care received at the practice. The practice had implemented policies and training to ensure staff documented all contact with patients.
  • There was a policy in place to ensure that patients with urgent medical conditions were signposted appropriately. We saw evidence of this being followed by staff.
  • Follow up appointments were scheduled and attended if required.
  • There were systems and audits in place for the oversight of prescribing within the practice.

Details of our findings are set out in the evidence table.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

29 Oct 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced focussed inspection of RHR Medical Centre on the 29th October 2019. This inspection was undertaken to follow up on breaches of regulations which had been identified at our previous inspection in June 2019 in relation to safe care and treatment.

This practice is currently rated as Requires Improvement.

We issued the practice with a warning notice requiring them to achieve compliance with the regulations by the 29th September 2019.

At this inspection we did not find that all of the requirements of the warning notice had been fully met.

Our key findings across the areas that we inspected for this focused inspection were as follows:

  • We saw evidence that patients were being seen by the appropriate clinician for their health concern however this was not always being done in a timely manner to ensure that urgent presentations were seen in line with the practice policy.
  • There were not always adequate systems to ensure patients’ health concerns were followed up when expected.
  • There was not always comprehensive detail recorded in patient records of discussions, examinations and safety netting advice given to patients.
  • We did not always see that patients were being prescribed medicines appropriately and appropriate rationale was not always documented. There was also evidence of patients being prescribed inappropriate amounts of medicines such as courses of antibiotics or being issued four months supply of repeat medicines on one prescription.

Due to the practice not meeting the requirements of the warning notice, the practice have been issued a further warning notice in relation to Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 in relation to governance at the practice.

Details of our findings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

18 Jun 2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an unannounced focussed inspection at RHR Medical Practice on 18 June 2019 in response to concerns that were found at another practice which was part of the Beechdale Medical Group.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations

We have rated this practice as Requires Improvement overall and for all population groups.

We have rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services.

We found that:

  • There were gaps in systems to assess, monitor and manage risks to patient safety.
  • When things went wrong, reviews and investigations were not always sufficiently thorough. Improvements were not always identified.
  • There were gaps in recruitment and training records of staff.

We have rated the practice as requires improvement for providing effective services.

We found that:

  • Care and treatment was not always delivered in line with national guidance.
  • There was no clinical oversight of clinicians and management were not aware of competencies of clinical staff.
  • There was limited evidence of quality improvement.

We have rated the practice as requires improvement for providing well-led services.

We found that:

  • The practice was transitioning through a change in management, and systems had not been embedded.
  • The practice did not always act on appropriate and accurate information.
  • We saw little evidence of systems and processes for learning, continuous improvement and innovation.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure that care and treatment is provided in a safe way.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Ensure that staff recruitment files, training requirements and vaccination status are up to date including any checks on locum GPs.
  • Ensure fire alarm checks are being carried out at the practice.
  • Improve methods of quality improvement at the practice including learning from events and completing audits.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

1 March and 7 March 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at RHR Medical Centre in May 2017. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement.

We carried out a focused inspection in December 2017 to confirm that the practice had taken the required action to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulation set out in warning notices issued to the provider following our May 2017 inspection. The warning notice was issued in respect of a breach of regulation related to good governance.

The full reports from the previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for RHR Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was a comprehensive inspection with a site visit undertaken on 1 March 2018. RHR Medical Centre is one of four locations of the provider ‘The Beechdale Medical Group’, All four locations were inspected between 22 February 2018 and 7 March 2018. The overall rating for this location is good.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Good

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Clear systems had been introduced to identify, assess and monitor risks so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. Where incidents occurred, the practice considered these as opportunities for learning.
  • Effective recording systems had been introduced to ensure significant events and incidents were monitored and reviewed. Learning was shared across the practice group.
  • Arrangements to respond to emergencies had been significantly improved; arrangements had been standardised across the practice group.
  • Regular risk assessments were undertaken including risk assessments in respect of fire safety.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
  • Staff were supported to access the training required to fulfil their roles and received regular appraisals. Arrangements for the support and supervision of nursing staff had been strengthened.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
  • Leadership arrangements had been reviewed and improved across the practice group; this included the recruitment of a new business manager to provide strategic and operational leadership.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider should make improvements.

The provider should:

  • Continue to improve the use of the clinical system to ensure all tasks are managed appropriately

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

1 December 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at RHR Medical Centre on 11 May 2017 and 23 May 2017. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement with a rating of inadequate for providing well-led services. The full comprehensive report from May 2017 can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for RHR Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

The overall rating of requires improvement will remain unchanged until we undertake a further full comprehensive inspection of the practice within the six months of the publication date of the report from May 2017.

This inspection was a focused inspection carried out on 1 December 2017 to confirm that the practice had taken the required action to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breach in regulation set out in a warning notice issued to the provider. The warning notice was issued in respect of a breach of regulation related to good governance.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • The practice had complied with the warning notice we issued and had taken the action needed to comply with legal requirements.
  • New systems had been introduced to ensure staff were provided with the training relevant to their role.
  • Systems to identify, monitor and mitigate risk had been improved in respect of risks related to fire and legionella.
  • Systems to monitor access to appointments had been improved and there was additional GP capacity.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

11 May 2017 and 23 May 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at RHR Medical Centre on 11 and 23 May 2017. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

RHR Medical Centre is a registered location under the provider, The Beechdale Medical Group. The Beechdale Medical Group (provider) held the contract for providing medical services at RHR medical centre for 13 months at the time of our inspection. All of the provider's four registered locations were inspected on 11 and 23 May 2017. All four locations have been rated inadequate for the well-led domain.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. However, the analysis and learning from significant events was not documented thoroughly enough.
  • Care and treatment was not always provided in a safe way for patients. For example, risks to people’s health and safety were not effectively managed; as well as infection control and fire safety.
  • The practice had limited GP staffing cover and as a result some patients accessed services from three other locations that are part of “The Beechdale Medical Group” (provider).
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance.
  • The cancer screening uptake rates and practice supplied data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (yet to be verified and published) showed patient outcomes were mixed.
  • The national GP patient survey results showed most patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Most patients said they were generally able to make an appointment with a GP and continuity of care had improved through the regular use of the same GP locums.
  • The practice responded to complaints raised but this was not always undertaken in a timely manner and there were limited meeting minutes to evidence that learning from complaints was shared widely.
  • The practice had a clear leadership structure but leadership capacity was insufficient and governance arrangements were not effectively managed.

The areas where the provider must make improvement are:

  • Ensure processes are operated effectively in respect of the reporting, recording, acting on and monitoring significant events, incidents and near misses.
  • Ensure systems are operated effectively to assess, monitor, and mitigate risk. This includes addressing identified concerns with infection control, fire safety, health and safety checks, and staff training.
  • Ensure that Statutory Notifications stipulated in the CQC (Registration) Regulations 2009 are submitted within the required timescales.

In addition the provider should:

  • Review staffing arrangements to ensure sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced persons are employed to meet the needs of patients.
  • Improve processes for making appointments and the availability of non-urgent appointments.
  • Review benchmarking data including high rates of emergency admissions.
  • Review the health needs of patients with a learning disability in line with recommended guidance and improve the uptake rate of cancer screening programmes.
  • Review the arrangements for the security of blank prescriptions in line with recommended guidance.
  • Review the storage of vaccines to ensure that sufficient space around the vaccine packages is allowed for air to circulate.
  • Strengthen systems for handling complaints.

Where a service is rated as inadequate for one of the five key questions or one of the six population groups or overall, it will be re-inspected within six months after the report is published. If, after re-inspection, the service has failed to make sufficient improvement, and is still rated as inadequate for any key question or population group or overall, we will place the service into special measures. Being placed into special measures represents a decision by CQC that a service has to improve within six months to avoid CQC taking steps to cancel the provider’s registration.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice