• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Caremark Kensington

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Unit 6, Shaftesbury Centre, 85 Barlby Road, London, W10 6BN (020) 3621 2253

Provided and run by:
A.I. Care Services Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes.

Date of assessment: 5 June to 5 August 2025. At the time of our assessment 61 people were using the service, 54 of whom were receiving support with personal care, including some people with a learning disability and autistic people.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found the provider was meeting the principles of Right support, right care, right culture.

The last rating for this service was good (report published 20 October 2018). We carried out this assessment because the service had not been inspected for a long time. We looked at all the quality statements and the overall rating for this service has changed to requires improvement.

We found the service was in breach of 2 regulations of the Health and Social Care Act (2014)in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance.

The call monitoring logs contained irregularities, including missed and or delayed visits. There was poor management and oversight of staff deployment and a consistent lack of time for staff to travel between home visits. Some people did not receive their care and support as and when planned. Medicines were not always administered and managed in accordance with the instructions from the prescriber, nor in line with people’s risk management plans. Governance systems failed to identify some of the concerns we found during this assessment and, where the provider had identified shortfalls, effective action to make improvements was not being completed in a timely manner or sustained.

Whilst concerns were found on this inspection, the service had recently passed to new owners, who were committed to making improvements. They agreed to provide us with an action plan to demonstrate how they intend to achieve this.

The provider followed robust recruitment procedures and staff were trained and supported well. People had their needs assessed and support packages were compiled to meet their individual requirements. People were supported to live healthy and safe lifestyles and to access healthcare professionals as needed. Staff understood the Mental Capacity Act and made sure people consented to their care and support. People were supported in the least restrictive way possible and had maximum choice and control of their lives. Managers carried out regular spot checks and audits. People were supported to make a complaint if needed and they were listened to and responded to appropriately. People were involved in all aspects of their care and support. Staff encouraged people to do as much for themselves as possible. Information was accessible and available to people in a format suitable for their communication needs. Equality and diversity were promoted and respected for everyone.

9 October 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 9 October 2018. This was the first inspection for this service since the provider registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in December 2016. We rated the service ‘Good’.

Caremark Kensington is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. The provider is a franchisee of Caremark. Not everyone using this service receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection the service was providing personal care to two people.

The service had a registered manager who had been in post since December 2016. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff were aware of their responsibilities to report suspected abuse and there were processes in place to safeguard people using the service. People told us that their care workers were caring and that they could always talk to a manager if they had concerns.

The provider carried out assessments of risks to people who used the service, including falls management plans which were reviewed as people’s needs changed. Care workers ensured that people were protected from the risk of hot water and that money was handled safely.

The provider operated safer recruitment measures to ensure that care workers were suitable for their roles. Care worker’s skills and knowledge were assessed during recruitment and staff received suitable training which was reviewed regularly. Managers carried out regular checks to make sure that care workers were carrying out tasks appropriately and that people were happy with their care, but care workers did not receive formal supervision.

Managers maintained audits and checks to ensure that they held that right information on people. Care workers told us that they maintained good contact with the office but there were no formal processes to record this. Care workers ensured that people received their medicines safely. The provider had assessed people’s health needs and how they could receive support to eat and drink safely.

Care was delivered in a safe and appropriate manner. Assessments were carried out of people’s care needs and plans were drawn up to meet these. Plans were detailed about the care people had and how this could be carried out in line with people’s wishes. People had consented to their care. Care workers ensured that people received the care they needed and were confident at highlighting issues of concern with managers so that these could be acted on.

We have rated this service ‘Good’. Where services are rated ‘Good’ we aim to return to carry out a further inspection within 30 months. We will continue to monitor this service and will return before this time if we think the quality of the service has changed.