• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Home Instead - Bromley, Chislehurst & Orpington

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

76 Croydon Road, Coney Hall Village, West Wickham, BR4 9HY (020) 8658 2535

Provided and run by:
Happy at Home (Bromley) Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Home Instead Bromley, Chislehurst and Orpington is a care at home service that provides personal care to people in their own homes. At the time of our assessment, the provider supported 80 people, including younger and older adults and people living with dementia. Most people using the service were older adults.

Date of assessment: 1 and 2 April 2026. We carried out this inspection because of the time elapsed since the last inspection. We conducted a comprehensive assessment that covered all quality statements across the five key questions. The last rating for the service was outstanding (published 19 April 2018). Following this inspection, the rating remains outstanding.

The provider delivered consistently outstanding, person-centred care that achieved exceptional outcomes for people. A consistent team of care staff supported people and knew them well, including how each person preferred to receive support and what they needed to manage risks to their safety. Staff worked proactively with health and social care professionals to coordinate hospital discharges, rehabilitation and ongoing support, enabling people to recover safely, maximise independence and improve their quality of life for example the provider partnered with a local nursing home that delivered rehabilitation and with a community physiotherapy team. This teamwork ensured people received a holistic package of care that led to life-enhancing outcomes.

Managers and staff understood people exceptionally well, tailored care to individual strengths, preferences and aspirations, and supported people to achieve outcomes that others had considered unachievable. Staff delivered compassionate, personalised care that promoted dignity, choice and independence. They adapted communication to meet individual needs, encouraged meaningful activities and developed trusting relationships that enhanced people’s wellbeing and reduced social isolation. Staff identified and managed risks effectively through robust care planning, regular reviews and proactive monitoring while enabling people to take positive risks safely.

Leaders created a positive, inclusive culture that placed people at the centre of care. They maintained effective governance, monitored quality continuously and acted promptly on learning to sustain high standards. Consistent staffing, specialist training and a strong commitment to staff wellbeing supported the delivery of safe, responsive and consistently outstanding care. The registered manager prioritised the wellbeing of both people and staff through a values-led approach that promoted continuity, reduced stress and supported positive working conditions. Practical measures such as consistent carers, minimal travel time and staff benefits contributed to reliable, high-quality care and a motivated, stable workforce.

30 October 2017

During a routine inspection

This announced inspection took place on 30 and 31 October 2017.

This was the provider’s first inspection since they re-registered in December 2016 having previously operated at a different address since 2013. The service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own home. Not everyone using Home Instead Senior Care – Bromley, Chislehurst & Orpington receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection 76 people were using the service with 40 of these receiving personal care.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff always treated people and their relatives with kindness, dignity and respect. People and relatives told us that staff were always caring and kind. People's privacy and dignity were respected and promoted when personal care was undertaken. People and relatives felt that staff went over and above to provide exceptional care to people. For example one person was regularly visited by staff when they had a period in hospital.

The provider, registered manager and staff were aware of the importance of providing outstanding care to people. People and relatives were highly complimentary of how the service was run and managed and all staff at the service. Staff fedback they felt supported and valued by the management and were listened to. There were effective systems to assess and monitor the quality of the care people received. Feedback from people and relatives showed that there were extremely high levels of satisfaction in respect of the care provided.

People and their relatives told us they felt safe with the staff. The service had clear procedures to recognise and respond to abuse. All staff completed safeguarding training. Senior staff completed risk assessments for people who used the service which provided sufficient guidance for staff to minimise identified risks. The service had a system to manage accidents and incidents to reduce reoccurrence.

The service had enough staff to support people and carried out robust background checks on staff before they started working to ensure only the right staff were employed. The service had an on call system to make sure staff and people had support outside the office working hours. Staff supported people so they took their medicine safely. The service provided an induction and training, and supported staff through regular supervision and annual appraisal, which included competency checks and regular team meetings to help them undertake their role.

People’s consent was sought before care was provided. The registered manager and staff were aware of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and only acted in people’s best interest.

Some staff supported people to buy their shopping and plan and prepare meals. Staff supported people and their relatives to enable people to access appointments if needed and liaised with health and social care professionals involved in their care if their health or support needs changed.

People and their relatives told us they were consulted about their care and support needs. Care plans were detailed, reviewed regularly and were up to date. The service had a clear policy and procedure for managing complaints. People knew how to complain and would do so if necessary however there had been no complaints received since the service had been registered.