You are here

Commit2Care Services Ltd Good

Reports


Review carried out on 9 September 2021

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Commit2Care Services Ltd on 9 September 2021. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Commit2Care Services Ltd, you can give feedback on this service.

Inspection carried out on 12 December 2018

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 12 December 2018 and was announced.

Commit2Care Services Ltd is registered to provide personal care to people in their own homes. Commit2Care Services Ltd is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of this inspection visit, 35 people received personal care.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

This was the first inspection since registering with the Care Quality Commission. At this inspection we found people received a service that was well led, providing safe, caring, effective and responsive care and support that met their needs.

People felt safe using the service and staff understood how to protect people from abuse and harm. There were procedures to keep people safe and manage identified risks to people’s care.

People had a detailed assessment of their health and social care needs before they used the service. Care plans contained detailed information to enable staff to provide people with the appropriate care and support for their needs. People’s care needs were regularly reviewed. The management team maintained regular contact with people, or their relatives, to check the care provided was what people needed and expected. People told us staff were reliable and stayed for the time needed. People were treated with dignity and respect.

Where medicines were administered, staff were trained and assessed as competent to do so safely. The provider had a recruitment process that had suitable checks to ensure that prior to staff starting work, they were suitable to support people who used the service.

People knew how to complain and information about making a complaint was available for people when they started using the service. There was a system to log and action any complaints or concerns that people had raised.

Staff felt there was good access to training and felt supported in their roles. People were assisted to access health services when needed and staff worked well with other health and social care professionals.

The principles of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) were followed by staff. People’s decisions and choices were respected and people felt involved in their care. People were supported to have choice and control of their lives and staff sought permission before assisting them.

Effective governance systems provided the registered manager with an overview of areas such as care records, medicine records and call times to assure themselves, people received a service they expected.