• Doctor
  • GP practice

Park House Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

6 Park Street, Bagshot, Surrey, GU19 5AQ (01276) 476333

Provided and run by:
Park House Surgery

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 11 June 2026. Park House Surgery is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 6395 patients under a contract held with NHS England. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the practice area is approximately 89% White, 6% Asian, 3% Mixed, 1% Black and 1% Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows deprivation within the practice population group is in the 10 decile (10 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others.

This was a focused assessment. We undertook this assessment due to the length of time since our last assessment. We assessed 10 quality statements from across all 5 key questions. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the practice, the context the practice was working within and how this impacted practice delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

Staff kept facilities clean and maintained equipment appropriately to ensure patients were kept safe. They assessed and managed the risk of infection well and took steps to control the risk of it spreading. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications, and experience.

Staff supported patients to live healthier lives, monitoring their care and treatment to ensure they received positive and consistent outcomes.

Staff treated patients with kindness, empathy, and compassion, and respected their privacy and dignity.

Patients could access care, treatment, and support when they needed it. Leaders and staff were alert to discrimination and inequality that could disadvantage groups of patients who used the practice and sought ways to address any barriers.

The practice had a clear vision and strategy, which considered the needs of the patients who used their service and the wider community. Staff understood their individual roles and responsibilities. Leaders accounted for the actions, behaviours, and performance of staff through clear and effective governance processes.

8 August 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Park House Surgery on 8 August 2018. Overall the practice is rated as good.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Park House Surgery on 8 August 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. The inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The practice used their knowledge of the local community and patient population to deliver high quality and person centred care.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence based guidelines.
  • There was a strong focus on improvement at all levels of the organisation.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) showed the results for practice management of patients with long-term conditions were good.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Patients said they were able to book an appointment that suited their needs. Pre-bookable, on the day appointments and home visits were available. Urgent appointments for those with enhanced needs were also provided the same day.
  • The practice was equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to review and improve ways to increase uptake for cervical screening.
  • Continue to review and improve ways to increase the number of health assessments for patients with a learning disability.
  • Continue to update policies and procedures
  • Continue to review and improve systems for recording information including risk assessments, alerts received and tracking of prescriptions.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.