You are here

Nightingale Homecare Norfolk (Brooke) Good

This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Inspection Summary


Overall summary & rating

Good

Updated 3 December 2019

About the service

Nightingale Homecare Norfolk (Brooke) is a domiciliary care service. They provide personal

care and support to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection the service was providing a regulated activity to 45 people.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People’s end of life care needs were not routinely assessed. We have made a recommendation that the provider review how it meets people’s end of life care needs.

People were protected from the risk of harm. Risks to people were assessed and staff took action to help mitigate identified risks. People were supported staff who had been recruited safely. People received support from fairly regular and consistent staff. The provider had recently implemented new systems which would help them to provide more regular and consistent visits for people. People’s medicines were managed safely and people received these as prescribed. People were supported by staff who had a good understanding of proper hygiene and infection control. Incidents that occurred in the service were reviewed. Appropriate actions to mitigate the likelihood of a repeat incident were taken.

Holistic assessments of people’s needs were carried out. People were supported by competent and trained staff. Where people required support with their meals this was done appropriately and staff supported people to eat the food they liked. People’s health care needs were assessed and staff supported people in this area where required. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were supported by kind and caring staff, who often gave up their own free time and resources to help enhance the quality of people’s lives. People’s independence was respected and supported. There were meaningful opportunities for people to discuss and make decision about the support provided.

People received person centred care which met their individual needs and preferences. People’s preferences and wishes in relation to the service provided were accommodated where possible. People had care plans in place which provided guidance and information for staff, although in some areas would have benefited from more person centred detail. People’s communication needs were assessed and supported. Staff understood the importance of social inclusion and supported people with social needs, this included facilitating the sharing of information with relatives when appropriate. People and relatives felt able to discuss any concerns about the service with staff. Staff took responsive action in response to any issues raised.

People and relatives felt some aspects of the service required further work. This was in relation to communication from the office and consistency of calls. The provider and registered manager were committed to seeking feedback from people using the service so they could make changes which would result in improved outcomes for the people using it. The provider had recently implemented changes to help improve communication and consistency of calls. There was good oversight of the service delivery by both the provider and registered manager. The provider had recognised the service could be strengthened by the development of a more formal governance system, plans were in place to address this. Staff felt happy and supported working in the service.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (report published 19 May 2017).

Why we inspected

Inspection areas

Safe

Good

Updated 3 December 2019

The service was safe.

Details are in our safe findings below.

Effective

Good

Updated 3 December 2019

The service was effective.

Details are in our effective findings below.

Caring

Good

Updated 3 December 2019

The service was caring.

Details are in our caring findings below.

Responsive

Good

Updated 3 December 2019

The service was responsive.

Details are in our responsive findings below.

Well-led

Good

Updated 3 December 2019

The service was well-led.

Details are in our well-Led findings below.