The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • Independent doctor

The Leger Clinic

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

The St Vincent Medical Centre, 77 Thorne Road, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN1 2ET (01302) 346988

Provided and run by:
The Leger Clinic Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The Leger Clinic on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The Leger Clinic, you can give feedback on this service.

2 March 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Outstanding overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Outstanding

Are services well-led? – Outstanding

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at the Leger Clinic on the 2 March 2022 as part of our inspection programme. The service was previously inspected in November 2017, but not rated.

The Ledger Clinic is an independent organisation which provides services to NHS patients under a contract with Doncaster Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and Bassetlaw CCG. The clinic also offers appointments to private patients. The service offers assessment and treatment for patients suffering from a wide variety of sexual difficulties and testosterone deficiency. This service is supported with lifestyle advice.

Dr Savage is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • The provider protected patients from abuse and avoidable harm. They had systems and processes for monitoring and managing risk.
  • There was a strong focus on providing care, treatment and support to achieve good outcomes for patients based on the best available evidence.
  • There was a strong, visible person-centred culture. The lead GP was motivated, passionate and inspired to offer care that was kind, accessible and respectful. We received feedback from staff who were committed and enthusiastic to improving patients’ lives. We reviewed 80 positive patient feedback forms, they said the care and support exceeded their expectations. The provider would go an extra mile to meet patient’s needs. Patients said they had got their lives back and their quality of life had improved.
  • There were proactive approaches for patients to access services at a time that suits them, ensured flexibility, choice and continuity of care. The provider had significantly reduced the consultation prices during the pandemic to ensure the service was accessible. The clinic offered appointments on extra days to meet patient’s needs. Patients had direct access to a GP by telephone and enquiries were responded to within 48 hours. 80 patient feedback forms were all highly positive about the service they received and confirmed it was quick and flexible.
  • Leadership and culture were used to drive and improve the delivery of high-quality person-centred care. Leaders worked closely with staff and others to make sure they prioritised compassionate and inclusive leadership. Staff said they worked well as a team, supported and they had a common focus on improving the quality and sustainability of care and people’s experiences. Staff told us the provider was dedicated to providing an exceptional service for patients. The service had a strong focus on the needs of patients. All the patient feedback was positive, and they spoke highly of the service.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

8 November 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 8 November 2017 at The Leger Clinic to ask the service the following key questions; are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the clinic was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of the services it provides.

The Ledger Clinic offers services to NHS and private patients and is situated on the first floor of the medical centre with a lift offering access to people with mobility issues. The clinic offers assessment and treatment for males and females suffering from a wide variety of sexual problems. The clinic does not see people under the age of 18. 

The provider, which is The Leger Clinic Limited, is registered with the Care Quality Commission to provide services at The Leger Clinic, St Vincent Medical Centre, 77 Thorne Road, Doncaster, DN1 2ET. The clinic is based just outside of Doncaster town centre within St Vincent Medical Centre and the rooms used consist of a shared reception area on the ground floor and a shared waiting room and a consulting room on the first floor. There is free on-road parking on all surrounding streets.

The clinic holds a list of registered patients who are either referred to the service or contact the provider directly to register as a private patient.  The clinic is available to patients who reside in Doncaster and surrounding areas and also to patients who live in other areas of England who require the services.

As part of our inspection we reviewed 46 Care Quality Commission comment cards where patients and members of the public shared their views and experiences of the service. All of the 46 comment cards we received were extremely positive about the service experienced. Patients said the clinic offered an excellent service and staff were sensitive, professional, very caring and treated them with dignity and respect. Comments also told us that the environment was safe, clean and hygienic. Patients told us they received information to help them make informed decisions about their care and treatment. A theme identified, in the cards and with patients we spoke with, was that the clinic had significantly improved the lives of some of the patients.

The clinic is owned by a GP with a specialist interest in sexual dysfunction and administrative duties are performed by GP practice staff co-located in the same building. The GP was also a partner in the GP practice co-located in the same building. The GP was supported by members of administrative staff.  Patients could also be seen by a Psychosexual Therapist who worked with the service. 

The clinic opening hours are:

  • Monday 8.30am to 11.30am
  • Tuesday 8.30am to 12 noon
  • Wednesday 9am to 6pm
  • One Saturday per month from 8.15am to 3pm

The provider is not required to offer an out of hours service. Patients who need emergency medical assistance out of the clinic opening hours are requested to seek assistance from alternative services such as their own GP, the NHS 111 telephone service or accident and emergency.

Our key findings were:

  • There was a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. 
  • Risks to patients were always assessed and well managed.
  • The clinic held a comprehensive central register of policies and procedures which were in place to govern activity.
  • The GP assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.
  • The GP had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • The clinic had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • The clinic proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour. 

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Review the security of the clinic's website online enquiry system.

14 November 2012

During a routine inspection

People were assessed and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual needs. We saw that treatment records outlined the different options available to people and what had been agreed. People said appointments were flexible and they were happy with the service they received. One person told us 'He's a good doctor, he still saw me even though I was late for my appointment.'

People who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse because the provider had taken reasonable steps to become knowledgeable about abuse and how concerns should be handled. This included making themselves aware of local safeguarding policies and arranging to attend training on this subject.

We saw the provider had attended a variety of training courses, groups and workshops to update and increase their knowledge. The people we spoke with told us they thought the doctor was good at his job and understood their condition and the treatment options available to them.

We saw that people who used the service had been asked for their views about the treatment they had received. The people we spoke with told us they did not have any issues with the service they had received. They were complimentary about the doctor and felt he provided a good discreet service. One person told us, 'I am very pleased with the service, it has been life changing for me coming here.'