• Doctor
  • GP practice

Highbridge Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Pepperall Road, Highbridge, Somerset, TA9 3YA (01278) 783220

Provided and run by:
Symphony Healthcare Services Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

13 June 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Highbridge Medical Centre on 13 June 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as good. At our previous inspection in October 2017 the practice was rated as good overall and for all key questions.

Safe - good

Effective - good

Caring - good

Responsive - good

Well-led - good

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Highbridge Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out this inspection in line with our inspection priorities and to follow up concerns reported to us.

We inspected all key questions.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A short site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
  • Staff were supported to carry out their role with appropriate training and supervision being provided.
  • Leaders and managers were accessible and listened to patient and staff views on the service provision.
  • Actions were taken where areas for improvement were identified.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Continue to monitor processes in order for patients to have all the recommended blood tests prior to a prescription being issued and at the time of medicine reviews.
  • Review patients on medicines which require monitoring and who may need additional medicines prescribed to protect their stomach lining.
  • Continue to provide relevant training for Legionella risk management.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care

10 October 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of the practice on 13 June 2017. The service was rated as requires improvement for safe and effective and good for caring, responsive and well-led. We rated the service as good overall. We issued a requirement notice in regards to Regulation 18 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, Staffing. The full comprehensive report on the 13 June 2017 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Wellington House on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced focused follow up inspection carried out on 10 October 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 13 June 2017. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

The practice is now rated as good for providing safe and effective services.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Systems and processes such as for mandatory training and infection, prevention and control measures were in place to keep patients safe.

  • The practice demonstrated they were driving quality improvement in patient outcomes.

  • There was enough clinical staff to keep patients safe and deliver effective care and treatment.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

13 June 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

The practice was previously inspected by the Care Quality Commission on 29 September 2015 and 2 August 2016 under the previous Provider. As a result of an inadequate rating the service was placed into special measures. In October 2016 Symphony Health Services agreed to assist the practice to action the changes required to ensure the service was safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led. On 1 April 2017 Symphony Health Services became the registered provider for the location, Highbridge Medical Centre.

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Highbridge Medical Centre on 13 June 2017. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement. Following our inspection additional information and evidence was provided to demonstrate actions to ensure compliance were taken after our visit.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • The provider had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.
  • Risks in regard of patients and staff safety required an additional focus such as infection prevention control, staff mandatory training and staffing levels. However there was evidence the practice were working towards rectifying these concerns or risks in regard to patients and staff safety.
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients we spoke to were complimentary and spoke of a much improved service. They told us that most of the time they found it easy to make an appointment and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear governance structure within Symphony Health Services, the provider and staff felt supported by management. However, the practice currently relied on a clinical lead to provide professional support to all clinical professionals due to vacancies and regular use of locum GPs.
  • The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • There was a comprehensive practice improvement plan in place and we saw evidence of new developments and changes to the practice.
  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.

The areas where the provider must make improvements:

  • Ensure sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced persons are deployed to meet the fundamental standards of care and treatment such as provision of adequate GP appointments during core practice hours.

In addition the provider should:

  • Embed clinical audits and re-audits to improve patient outcomes. And consider a process to check patients consent has been recorded appropriately.
  • Address identified concerns with infection prevention and control practice.
  • Embed mandatory training provision for existing staff. For example, fire safety training.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice