The Care Quality Commission
  • Care Home
  • Care home

Green Acres

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

130 Nork Way, Banstead, Surrey, SM7 1HP (01737) 351358

Provided and run by:
Heathcotes Care Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 22 August 2025 – 3 September 2025.

Green Acres is a care home for up to 6 people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of our assessment, 5 people lived at the home.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

We found the service was meeting this guidance, which meant people were supported in a way which maximised their dignity, choice and access to their local community.

Staff encouraged people to make choices about their care and how they lived their lives. They worked well with other professionals to achieve the best outcomes for people. This included following professional advice and guidance relating to people’s care.

Staff kept people’s needs under review, including their health, emotional, and communication needs. Feedback from people’s families was listened to and acted upon.

People lived in a safe, clean environment. There were always enough staff available to meet people’s needs. Staff attended safeguarding training and knew how to recognise and report abuse. People’s medicines were managed safely. Staff understood the importance of gaining people’s consent to their care.

Leaders and staff had a shared culture based on openness and trust. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and there was a strong sense of teamwork. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

Staff had access to the induction, training and support they needed to do their jobs. Staff were supported to develop in their roles and to achieve further qualifications.

The provider’s governance systems helped ensure effective management oversight of the service. There was a service improvement plan in place, which was regularly monitored to ensure action was taken to address areas identified for improvement.

12 January 2018

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 12 January 2018 and was unannounced. This was the first inspection since the provider registered the service in October 2016.

Heathcotes (Green Acres) is a residential care home providing support to up to six people. At the time of our inspection there were six people living at the service. People living at the service had learning disabilities, autism, physical disabilities and mental health conditions.

Heathcotes (Green Acres) is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

Heathcotes (Green Acres) accommodates six people in one adapted building.

The care service has been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff worked with people to identify goals and manage risks in a way that enabled people to develop confidence and skills whilst ensuring that they were safe. The provider took a proactive approach to incidents and which meant that they were deescalated quickly and systems were in place to respond to concerns. Staff understood their roles in safeguarding people from abuse. There were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people’s needs and the provider had carried out checks to ensure that staff were suitable for their roles.

Care was planned in a person-centred way. People had their own records to document their care and activities using pictures and photographs. Care planning had achieved positive goals for people and helped them to develop skills and try new things. Care plans were regularly reviewed and any changes to people’s needs were actioned by staff. People were supported by allocated staff that oversaw their care and helped to identify choices and preferences. People and relatives were routinely involved in care planning. People had access to a range of activities that suited their needs and interests.

Staff had received appropriate training for their roles. Staff had attended training courses in learning disabilities and autism best practice, as well as mandatory modules. Staff received regular one to one supervisions and there was an appraisal process in place. Staff felt supported by the registered manager and the provider had systems in place to enable effective communication between staff. Regular meetings took place that involved staff, people and relatives in decisions about the service. The provider had a clear complaints policy in place and had a proactive approach to feedback to identify improvements.

People received their medicines safely. Trained staff administered medicines and the provider managed medicines in line with best practice and regularly audited them. People were supported to access healthcare professionals when required with support from staff. The provider had systems in place to ensure the risk of the spread of infection was reduced and people lived in a clean home environment. Staff knew people well and interacted with them with kindness and compassion. Staff were respectful of people’s privacy and dignity when providing care to them. People were supported to maintain relationships that were important to them.

The provider carried out regular checks on the quality of the care that people received. There was a variety of audits in place to monitor quality and the provider had sent surveys to relatives to gather feedback from them. The provider maintained accurate an up to date records and had notified CQC of important incidents and events. People were asked for consent and care was provided in line with the Mental Capacity Act (2005).