• Care Home
  • Care home

Albert Suites at Battersea Place

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

73 Albert Bridge Road, Battersea, London, SW11 4DS (020) 7924 8601

Provided and run by:
Battersea Place Retirement Village Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 14 October 2025.

Albert Suites at Battersea Place is a 'care home' that provides people with nursing and personal care. The service can accommodate up to 27 people. At the time of our inspection, there were 13 older people receiving nursing and/or personal care in Albert Suites at Battersea Place.

We undertook this inspection to check the provider had improved and followed the action plan we required them to complete after we had identified issues with the way the care home was managed at their last CQC inspection. This was because they did not have a registered manager in post which had negatively affected staff morale and the effectiveness of how they operated their governance systems. Consequently, we rated the care home good overall at their last inspection [published 25 October 2022] but requires improvement for the key question, Is the service well-led?

This inspection was unannounced and conducted by 2 adult social care inspectors and supported by a regulatory coordinator. We reviewed 22 quality statements in relation to the 3 key questions, Is the service safe, responsive, and well-led? For all the other key questions which were not reviewed as part of this inspection we used the ratings awarded at their last inspection to calculate the overall rating.

Based on the findings of this inspection we continue to rate the care home good overall and have changed their rating for the well-led key question from requires improvement to good. This was because we found the care home had improved how it was now managed and operated their governance systems.

The service had continued to experience high levels of management turnover in recent years and remained without a registered manager. However, a suitably experienced and qualified manager had been appointed in the last 12 months, and they have now applied to be registered with us as the manager of both Albert Suites care home and Battersea Place home care and supported living services.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training to maintain good-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People participated in decisions about their care. The service provided information that people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and support. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People engaged in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Managers and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Managers were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers collaborated with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement.

 

24 June 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Albert Suites at Battersea Place is a ‘care home’ and provides personal care with nursing for up to 30 older people. At the time of our inspection, there were eight people living at the home.

People’s experience of using this service

People using the service and their relatives were happy that they were safe and well cared for.

Despite the positive feedback, we found some aspects related to the management of the service had deteriorated since the previous inspection. There had been some changes to the management of the service and also some restructuring of its set up was also being considered. These changes had an impact on the morale within the staff team, the provider’s engagement with staff and also some aspects of its quality assurance checks which had not been completed in the period since the previous registered manager left.

There were enough staff employed to meet people's needs and there were robust recruitment procedures in place which meant that staff were safe to work with people. Risks to people were reviewed every month which meant they were supported to remain as safe as possible. People were supported to take their medicines in a safe manner. We were assured that the provider had safe infection prevention and control procedures in place, including in relation to the management of COVID-19.

Staff were offered a mixture of face to face and online training.

People were supported to eat a balanced diet with a daily changing menu and a variety of alternative dishes always available. Care plans reflected people's personal preferences and their support needs. There was a good activities programme on offer, with both individual and group activities taking place. These were delivered in line with people's wishes. The provider listened and responded when concerns or complaints were raised.

Some aspects of the service were managed well. The new manager was approachable and wanted to engage and encourage feedback from people and staff. The provider worked with local partners to ensure people received the appropriate support.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update.

The last rating for this service was good (published 28 June 2018).

Why we inspected

We received some concerns in relation to the management of the service. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of Safe and Well-led only.

We also used a targeted approach to look at specific concerns we had about training and food under the Key Question of Effective. As we only looked at part of Effective, we have not changed the rating from the previous inspection for this Key Question.

We reviewed all the information we held about the service. No areas of concern were identified in the other Key Questions. We therefore did not inspect them. Ratings from previous comprehensive inspections for the Key Questions of Caring and Responsive were used in calculating the overall rating at this inspection.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and the relevant local authorities to monitor progress. We will return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

17 April 2018

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 17 April 2018 and was unannounced. This was the first inspection of the service since it was registered by CQC on 24 October 2016.

Albert Suites at Battersea Place is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

Albert Suites at Battersea Place can accommodate 27 people. It is arranged over one floor and accommodates people with nursing needs including those on palliative care. The majority of people using the service at the time of the inspection were post-operative, coming in for respite following a hospital admission. At the time of the inspection there were 16 people using the service.

There was a registered manager at the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People using the service told us they felt safe at Albert Suites. They said that staff were caring and friendly and respected their privacy. They told us they were involved in planning their care and were able to make choices about how they wanted this to be delivered. This included being fully involved in the initial assessment stage when planning their care, their meals and the activities they wanted to do.

Staff recruitment checks were robust and new staff completed a comprehensive induction and training programme which helped them to prepare for their roles. Staff received regular supervision and appraisal. Although there were enough staff employed to meet people’s needs, we received feedback regarding the difference in care people received from agency staff as compared to permanent staff. The registered manager was aware of this and had taken steps to try and resolve this.

Checks were completed on the equipment and the environment which was clean and well maintained. People had access to an outdoor space and ample indoor space including private and communal areas outside of their bedrooms to meet with friends and relatives.

People’s health needs were managed by the provider. A GP visited weekly to review people and care plans contained details about their health requirements. We received feedback that the nursing care was good.

Care planning, including risk assessments and care plans was appropriate. Risks to people were identified and steps identified to control risks to people. Care plans were clear, comprehensive and reviewed regularly.

The service was well led. The values of the service were taught and embedded into staff during their recruitment and induction. The registered manager was open to establishing and maintaining relationships with external stakeholders. A number of audits took place to monitor the quality of service.