• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: MiHomecare - Clacton-on-Sea

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2 Brunel Court, Brunel Road, Clacton On Sea, Essex, CO15 4LU 0333 121 5901

Provided and run by:
MiHomecare Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

13th and 14th October 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 13 and 14 October 2015. MiHomecare – Clacton on Sea is a domiciliary care agency that provides personal care and domestic support to older people who live in their own homes. The organisation offers support to people living in Clacton-on-Sea and local surrounding areas. There are currently 140 people who use the service.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

There were systems in place which provided guidance for staff on how to safeguard the people who used the service from the potential risk of abuse. Staff understood the various types of abuse and knew who to report any concerns to.

There were procedures and processes in place to ensure the safety of the people who used the service. People were safe because staff understood their responsibilities in managing risk. Where people required assistance to take their medicines there were arrangements in place to provide this support safely.

There were sufficient numbers of care workers who were well supported to meet the needs of the people who used the service. Care workers had good relationships with people who used the service.

Staff received regular training relevant to their roles and responsibilities. They had the skills, knowledge and experience required to support people with their care and support needs. Where people required assistance with their dietary needs there were systems in place to provide this support safely.

People or their representatives, where appropriate, were involved in making decisions about their care and support. Care plans provided guidance for staff, had been tailored to the individual and contained information about how they communicated and their ability to make decisions.

Where care workers had identified concerns in people’s wellbeing there were systems in place to contact health and social care professionals to make sure they received appropriate care and treatment.

Care workers understood their roles and responsibilities in providing safe and good quality care to the people who used the service.

A complaints procedure was in place. People’s concerns and complaints were listened to, addressed in a timely manner and used to improve the service.

The service had a quality assurance system and shortfalls were addressed. As a result the quality of the service continued to improve.

28 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We inspected MiHomecare Clacton-on-Sea 28 October 2013.

We gathered some very positive comments from people provided care by MiHomecare. One person told us: "The carers that come to my home are all very nice people. They always check before they leave there is anything else I need. They're very helpful and professional."

We checked with staff members they received consent from the people they were caring for before any care activity was provided.

We saw that people were protected against the risks associated with medicines because appropriate arrangements were in place to manage medicines.

The staff recruitment processes seen within the staff records were appropriate before staff began to work for the provider.

We found records were kept accurately and appropriately for the benefit of people provided care.

15, 17 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We had the opportunity to talk with three of the people who used the service. All of the people we spoke with were happy with the care they received. They told us that they were supported in the way they wanted to be, had their privacy and dignity maintained and that they were able to express their views and individuality.

People we spoke with told us that the staff knew how they wanted to be supported and that they made sure they got what they needed. One person who we asked what they thought of the quality of care said, 'The girls are very kind and look after me.' Another person said that, 'I think the service is perfect for me.'

People told us that they were included when their care plans were written and were given a chance to read them before they were finalised.

We spoke with four staff members who told us that they received supervision and that they felt that they received sufficient training to enable them to do their job effectively. We found evidence that the organisation had systems in place to monitor the quality of care the service provides.

3 February 2012

During a routine inspection

People spoken with told us that staff who supported them provided care that met their needs. They also told us that they were happy with the service provided by the agency.

People made positive comments about staff saying that they were very pleasant, treated them with respect and, on the whole, their timekeeping was good.

All the people spoken with said that if they had any concerns or complaints they were confident that the agency would deal with them appropriately.