• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Cross Hall Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

31 High Street, St Mary Cray, Orpington, Kent, BR5 3NL (01689) 661390

Provided and run by:
Living Care Medical Services Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

16 January 2018

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We previously carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Cross Hall Surgery on 17 May 2017. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report on the 17 May 2017 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Cross Hall Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was a comprehensive inspection carried out on 16 January 2018 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 17 May 2017. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice is now rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • The practice had effective systems and processes to make sure they assessed and monitored the service provided. There was an effective system in place for monitoring pathology results and ensuring Docman (a patient management system) were cleared daily.

  • Staff were following National Institute for Health and Care Excellence(NICE) guidelines.

  • The urgent referral policy had been reviewed since the last inspection and staff were following the new process.

  • Patients’ outcomes had been monitored and improved, as full cycle audits had been undertaken since the last inspection.

  • The practice had changed their process for processing two week urgent referrals to make it effective.
  • The practice had reviewed temperature monitoring of their vaccine refrigerator to ensure they were in line with current guidance, they were using a second thermometer and were keeping daily logs.

  • Nurse appointments had been reviewed and were flexible for patients.

  • There was appropriate supervision and mentoring for the practice nurse.

  • The provider had recruited a permanent lead GP, and lead nurse that worked across all Living Care Medical Services Limited locations. They had also recruited a healthcare assistant since the last inspection.

  • The practice had reviewed, assessed and monitored staff training, records for cleaning equipment and labelling sharp bins.All staff members were up to date with role specific training.

  • Governance arrangements operated effectively.
  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider should make improvements.

The provider should:

  • Review logging verbal complaints.

  • Review how appointments for Saturdays are advertised.

  • Review the need for a palliative care register and conducting multidisciplinary team meetings.

  • Review accessibility for patients with hearing impairment.

  • Review the arrangements for treating emergencies following a risk assessment.

  • Review patient survey results relating to consultations with GPs.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

17 May 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Location Cross Hall Surgery on 17 May 2017. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • The practice did not have clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety. For example patients’ pathology results were not checked or cleared daily. We found one urgent referral had not been processed.
  • Fridge temperatures were monitored, however there was only an internal thermometer being used and it was not calibrated frequently. This is not in accordance with Public Health England guidance.
  • Blank prescription forms were not stored securely.
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance; however, we found that National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines were not always followed. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.

  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.
  • The practice was piloting a phlebotomy clinic once a week which started on the 12 May 2017.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure they assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of patients, ensuring pathology results and docman letters are cleared daily. Also ensuring that National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines are followed.

  • Ensure urgent referral policy is followed.

  • Ensure that full cycle audits are performed to improve patients outcome.

  • Ensure there is appropriate supervision and mentoring for the nurse practitioner.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review, assess and monitor staff training, records for cleaning equipment and labelling of sharp bins.

  • Review temperature monitoring on medicine fridges to make sure they are in line with current guidance.

  • Review flexibility with nurse appointments.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice