• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

My Baby Enterprises Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

265 Barlow Moor Road, Manchester, Lancashire, M21 7GJ (0161) 667 1599

Provided and run by:
My Baby Enterprises Ltd

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 10 February 2022

My Baby Enterprises Ltd, trading as My Baby Company Ltd, has one location at Chorlton-cum-Hardy which they opened in 2016 and a satellite service at Chorley, where the main offices are located, which they opened in 2017. The service has been registered with the Care Quality Commission since 12th October 2016

The service had a registered manager in place since initial registration. The service provides a range of baby keep sake ultrasound scans in 2D, 3D and 4D during pregnancy for women aged 18 and over. They also facilitate Non Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) via external companies. The service also offers to take the blood or saliva samples for these tests if the women choose to do this. It is registered to provide the regulated activity of diagnostic and screening procedures. We have not previously inspected this service.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 10 February 2022

We have not previously rated this service. We rated it as good because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for women and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect women from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to women, acted on them and kept good care records. The service managed safety incidents well and learnt lessons from them. Staff collected safety information and used it to improve the service.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of the women, provided information that advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information.
  • Staff treated women with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to women, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of the local people, took account of women’s individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for their results.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the services vision and values and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focussed on the needs of women receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with women and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

However:

  • Staff files did not always contain previous employer references, application forms, employment history or photographic identification.
  • The service did not keep records of staff appraisals or 1:1s, staff meetings or carry out any audits such as hand hygiene or cleaning audits. Following the inspection, we were told by the service leadership team that they had implemented these.

Diagnostic and screening services

Good

Updated 10 February 2022

We have not previously rated this service. We rated it as good because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for women and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect women from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to women, acted on them and kept good care records. The service managed safety incidents well and learnt lessons from them. Staff collected safety information and used it to improve the service.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of the women, provided information that advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information.
  • Staff treated women with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to women, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of the local people, took account of women’s individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for their results.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the services vision and values and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focussed on the needs of women receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with women and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

However:

  • Staff files did not always contain previous employer references, application forms, employment history or photographic identification.
  • The service did not keep records of staff appraisals or 1:1s, staff meetings or carry out any audits such as hand hygiene or cleaning audits. Following the inspection, we were told by the service leadership team that they had implemented these.