• Doctor
  • Out of hours GP service

PC24 Also known as PC24 Kings Mill Hospital

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

PC24 Kings Mill Hospital, Mansfield Road, Sutton In Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 4JL (01623) 466766

Provided and run by:
NEMS Community Benefit Services Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about PC24 on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about PC24, you can give feedback on this service.

12 and 18 October 2018

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection 17 & 20 April 2015 and was rated as Good)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection at PC24 Out of Hours, also known as PC24 Kings Mill Hospital on 12 October 2018. We carried out this inspection in response to information of concern we had received. As part of this we also inspected the provider’s headquarters (NEMS Community Benefit Services Limited) based in Fanum House, Nottingham on 18 October 2018.

At this inspection we found:

  • The service had good systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When they did happen, the service learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The provider demonstrated effective joint working arrangements with key partners to develop-coordinated care.
  • The service routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
  • Regular audits were carried out on the quality of care being provided by clinical staff. Actions were taken to improve any performance that falls below expectations.
  • The service was responsive to patients’ needs. It provided face-to-face consultations, telephone consultations and home visits depending on the needs of patients.
  • This was an unannounced inspection therefore, we were unable to receive feedback from patients during the inspection. However, patient feedback received by the service demonstrated that staff involved and treated people with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Patients were able to access care and treatment from the service within an appropriate timescale for their needs. Processes were in place to identify patients that needed more urgent attention.
  • The service was aware of some of the challenges to deliver quality care and was taking action to address them.
  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Consider appropriate signage in the waiting room to alert patients on action to take if their condition is worsening.
  • Develop the staff induction programme to include a site specific induction.
  • Ensure appropriate oversight of risk assessments by the hospital. For example, those in relation to legionella, health and safety and fire.
  • Consider record keeping for consent when using a chaperone for intimate examinations.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice