Comfort Home Care

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

We had received concerns that staff were not always following good infection control practices. This included not wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in line with current guidance.

People and relatives told us; staff always wore the correct PPE during their visits. Comments included, “Very clean and sanitary, sticking by government rules especially with regards to PPE. Always go above and beyond.” Everyone we spoke with praised the care staff and the care they received.

Staff had received infection control training and had access to PPE. They were regularly tested in line with the government’s current testing program.

The registered manager had needed to implement the provider’s covid-19 contingency plan, which had caused some disruption to the service people received. Some people had found these slight changes upsetting. The registered manager had written to people to reassure them.

The provider’s infection prevention and control policy was up to date and staff had access to regular testing.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection: The last rating for this service was Good (published 23 February 2018).

Why we inspected

We undertook this targeted inspection to follow up on specific concerns which we had received about the service. The inspection was prompted in response to concerns received about infection control risks. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks.

CQC have introduced targeted inspections to check specific concerns. They do not look at an entire key question, only the part of the key question we are specifically concerned about. Targeted inspections do not change the rating from the previous inspection. This is because they do not assess all areas of a key question. We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from these concerns.

Please see the safe section of this full report.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Comfort Home Care on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

This was the first inspection of the service. The comprehensive inspection took place on 2 and 5 February 2018 and was announced.

There were 54 people receiving a service from the agency. Although the majority of people using the agency received a regulated activity, some received support visits only. CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. The time of visits ranged from 30 minutes to one hour, with the frequency of visits from once a week to five times a day. There were four people who required two care staff at each visit to support them. There were 25 full and part-time care staff employed.

The service does not have a condition on its registration with CQC that they required a registered manager. However the provider had decided in the interest of good governance that the manager apply for registration. The manager had undertaken their fit person interview with CQC and were awaiting the outcome. A registered manager is a person who has registered with CQC to manage the service. Like registered persons, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. Since the inspection the manager has been registered with CQC.

People using the service, their family members, staff and health care professionals were happy with the care and praised the service provided. People were protected from abuse and harm because staff had a good understanding of how to respond to concerns. All of the management team provided personal care to people.

People received a service from staff that were recruited, trained and supported to provide a safe and effective service. All visits had been met and people were informed if a care worker might be late. Risks were assessed and managed in a skilled way to promote people’s welfare.

People received their medicines as needed and the service sought any health care advice from health care professionals.

People’s legal rights were upheld. They were involved in all decisions about their care, which was regularly reviewed. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Care workers had received training on the Mental Capacity Act 2005. They ensured people were asked for their consent before they carried out any care or support.

The agency provided a service which was caring, respectful and promoted people’s privacy and dignity.

People had confidence that any issue or complaint would be handled in their best interest.

The provider and manager were experienced and led by example. People’s views were regularly sought, checks made on the standards of care provided and the importance of continual improvement understood and followed through.