• Care Home
  • Care home

Minshull House

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

Meadow Lane, West Derby, Liverpool, Merseyside, L12 5EA (0151) 330 9500

Provided and run by:
Autism Initiatives (UK)

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 31 March to 21 April 2026. Minshull House is a residential care home providing short‑breaks (respite) for up to 5 people with a learning disability and autistic people at any one time. At the time of our assessment, 5 people were using the service. This assessment was undertaken because the service had an aged rating.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities most people take for granted.

This provider was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

The service delivered exceptionally high‑quality, person‑centred short breaks for people with a learning disability and autistic people, consistently achieving positive outcomes that enhanced wellbeing, independence and quality of life. Support was highly individualised, strengths‑based and responsive, ensuring people felt valued, empowered and at ease during their stays.

People using the service, and their families, were well informed, fully involved and genuinely listened to. Communication was consistently accessible, creative and tailored to individual needs, enabling people to express their views, make meaningful choices and influence how support was delivered. Feedback was actively encouraged and clearly embedded into service development and daily practice.

The service demonstrated exceptional caring practice, with kindness, compassion and respect embedded in everyday care and support. Staff built warm, trusting relationships and showed a deep understanding of what mattered to each person, consistently protecting dignity, privacy and emotional wellbeing. Support was calm, empathetic and responsive, particularly during times of anxiety or distress, and people were involved in decisions in ways that worked for them.

The service was well led, with visionary, compassionate and inclusive leadership that set high expectations and inspired a culture of excellence. Governance arrangements were robust providing assurance, proactive risk management and continuous improvement. Managers and staff demonstrated transparency, accountability and a commitment to learning and improvement.

Staff were highly skilled, motivated and valued, supported through excellent training, reflective supervision and strong professional development opportunities. Equality, diversity and inclusion were embedded across the workforce, creating a respectful, supportive and safe environment enabling staff to deliver exceptional care.

Managers and staff worked collaboratively and creatively with partners, families and community organisations, promoting inclusion, continuity and access to meaningful community experiences. There was a commitment to innovation, learning and sustainability, with leaders proactively planning for future needs and driving improvements informed by best practice and lived experience.

19 September 2017

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 19 September 2017 and was announced.

Situated on the doorstep of Croxteth Country Park and a short drive from Liverpool City Centre Minshull House offers autism-specific short breaks care for up to five adults in the West Derby suburb of Liverpool. The home has five ensuite bedrooms, with one bedroom on the ground floor. The home has a lounge, dining room and large kitchen. The ground floor is fully accessible for wheelchairs and has fully accessible bathing facilities. There is a large garden area at the rear and side of the building.

There was a registered manager in post; they provided an effective lead in the home and was supported by a clear management structure. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

There were three people staying at the service on the day of our inspection.

Medication was stored safely and securely. Staff had completed training in medication administration. They also undertook practical competency assessments to ensure they were administering medication safely. However support plans for giving people ‘as required’ medication had not been completed. The registered manager rectified this during the inspection. We have made a recommendation about this.

People were kept safe because there were arrangements in place to protect them from the risk of abuse. Staff understood what abuse was and the action to take if they should have to report concerns or actual abuse.

People’s nutritional needs were monitored by the staff. People received food of their choice.

Each person who used the service had a person centred plan. The plans we looked at contained relevant and detailed information. This helped to ensure staff had the information they needed to support people in the correct way and respect their wishes, their likes and dislikes.

A range of risk assessments had been undertaken depending on people’s individual needs to reduce the risk of harm. Risk assessments were in place and gave staff guidance to keep themselves and people who lived in the home safe, whilst in the home and when out in the community.

Sufficient numbers of staff were employed to provide care and support to help keep people safe and to offer support in accordance with individual need.

Staff had been appropriately recruited to ensure they were suitable to work with vulnerable adults. Staff were only able to start work at the home when the provider had received satisfactory pre-employment checks.

Staff received an induction and regular mandatory (required) training to update their practice and knowledge. Records showed us that staff were up-to-date with the training.

Staff told us they felt supported in their roles and responsibilities.

Staff had good knowledge of people’s likes and dislikes in respect of food and drinks. We saw that people had plenty to eat and drink during our inspection.

People who stayed at the service took part in activities both in the home and in the community. Some people attended school, college or a day centre.

During our visit we observed staff supported people in a caring manner and treated people with dignity and respect. Staff understood people’s individual needs and how to meet them. We saw that there were good relationships between people living at the home and staff, with staff taking time to talk and interact with people.

A procedure was in place for managing complaints and family members we spoke with were aware of what to do should they have a concern or complaint.

Systems were in place to check the quality of the service and ensure improvements were made. This included carrying out regular audits on areas of practice.

The building was fully accessible for people with mobility difficulties and those who used a wheelchair. We found it was clean and well maintained.