• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Heston Care Services Ltd

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

16 Walnut Tree Road, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW5 0LR (020) 8581 7027

Provided and run by:
Mr Ishtiaq Fazal

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Heston Care Services Ltd on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Heston Care Services Ltd, you can give feedback on this service.

17 November 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

About the service

Heston Care Services Ltd is a supported living service for people with learning disabilities and/or autism. At the time of the inspection, 4 people were living at the service and they had their own bedrooms and tenancies with access to communal areas. One of the people being supported lived in a annexe in the garden of the location. A fifth person who received support was living at another location.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. There were 4 people who received support or encouragement with personal care and 1 person who received support with their medicines.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Right Support

People’s medicines were not always administered in line with the provider’s procedure and best practice. People were able to go shopping, access their religious community and visit people with staff providing support when requested.

Right Care

People’s care plans were not always written in a person-centred manner to identify the support that was required and how the person wanted their care provided. The provider did not always investigate incidents and accidents, safeguarding concerns or complaints to enable them to identify where lessons to be learned to reduce possible risks. Risk management plans were not always developed to provide guidance on how to mitigate the identified risks.

Right Culture

The provider did not have quality assurance processes in place which enabled them to identify when improvements were required to records and the way care was provided. The provider had a recruitment process enabling them to identify new staff with the required skills and experience for the role. The provider worked in partnership with the local authority and healthcare professional involved in people’s care.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 7 February 2019).

Why we inspected

This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service. The local authority carried out an assessment of the provider and they shared a copy of the action plan developed by the provider. You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report.

Enforcement and Recommendations

We have identified breaches in relation to person centred care, safe care and treatment and good governance at this inspection.

Full information about CQC’s regulatory response to the more serious concerns found during inspections is added to reports after any representations and appeals have been concluded.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

8 January 2019

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 8 January 2019. We told the provider two working days before our visit that we would be coming because the location was registered as a supported living service providing care for people in their own homes and we wanted to make sure the registered manager would be available.

The last inspection of the service was on 19 December 2017, when we rated the service requires improvement for all key questions and overall. Following the last inspection, we asked the provider to complete an action plan to show what they would do and by when to improve the key questions to at least ‘good’.

At this inspection of 8 January 2019, we found they had made the necessary improvements.

Heston Care Services provides care and support to people living in a 'supported living' setting, so that they can live in their own home as independently as possible. People's care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.

At the time of our inspection there were two people living in the supported living service and both were receiving personal care. Both service users had a learning disability and mental health needs.

The service was the only location managed by the provider, who was an individual.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People using the service were happy there. Their needs were met, and they were supported to learn new skills and make choices about their lives. There was evidence that one person's mental health had significantly improved as a result of the care and support they were receiving at the service. People were treated respectfully by kind and caring staff, some of whom were specifically recruited because they shared the same ethnic background as people using the service and could speak with them in their first language. Whilst people took part in a range of different activities, the provider was seeking to establish more structured routines and regular activities to help people develop further skills.

The staff were appropriately trained and supervised. They had the necessary skills to care for people and meet their needs. The registered manager worked closely with the staff team to offer support, guidance and training. There were enough staff to meet people's needs and keep them safe. The provider's recruitment procedures ensured that the staff were suitable.

People had consented to their care and treatment. For more complex decisions where they lacked the mental capacity to understand these, the provider had acted in accordance with the appropriate legislation to ensure that decisions were made in their best interests.

People had enough to eat and drink and made choices about the food. People were supported to access healthcare services and the staff worked closely with the other professionals caring for people. The risks to their wellbeing had been assessed and planned for and they received their medicines safely.

The provider had effective systems for monitoring the quality of the service and making improvements. Accidents, incidents and complaints were investigated, and the provider learnt from these to improve the service. People using the service and other stakeholders were asked for their views about the service.

19 December 2017

During a routine inspection

We undertook an announced inspection of Heston Care Services on 19 December 2017. We told the provider two days before our visit that we would be coming because the location provides a supported living service for people in their own homes and staff might be out visiting people.

This service provides care and support to people living in one ‘supported living’ setting, so that they can live in their own home as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.

At the time of the inspection the service was providing support through the supported living service for two people but only one person received care that comes under the Regulated Activity of Personal Care. Therefore we are only able to refer to the care provided and records of that one person.

This was the first inspection since the provider registered the location with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in September 2016.

A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The provider had a recruitment process in place but appropriate references were not always requested from the most recent employer and a record of references obtained by telephone were not recorded to provide an audit trail that appropriate recruitment processes had been followed. This meant the provider could not ensure new care workers were suitable and had the appropriate skills and knowledge for the role.

Risk management plans were not in place to provide care workers with guidance on how to reduce risks when providing support and to promote people’s safety.

The provider had a procedure for the administration of medicines but records did not clearly identify who had administered medicines which increased the risk of medicines not being administered as prescribed.

The provider did not have processes in place to ensure care was provided within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and to help protect people’s rights.

Care worker had regular support with the registered manager but the training provided was not structured.

Information was not provided for people using the service in an accessible format such as using clear, plain English or pictures to meet their communication needs.

The provider stated they completed a ranged of audits but the outcomes were not recorded. It was therefore not clear what the findings of the audits were and what areas had been identified for improvement.

Regular meetings were held with external professionals involved in providing support but notes were not made of the discussions to provide an audit trail and to maintain a record of the decisions made.

We found breaches of regulations in relation to need for consent, safe care and treatment, good governance, staffing and fit and proper persons employed. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

The provider had procedures to record and investigate incidents and accidents, safeguarding concerns and complaints so learning took place and to prevent reoccurrence of similar issues.

The number of care workers required to provide appropriate support was identified through the local authority referral so people were cared according to their support plan.

An assessment of the person’s support needs had been completed before they started to receive support.

Care workers understood how to maintain a person’s privacy and dignity when providing support.

Support plans identified the person’s religious and cultural supports needs to assist the care workers in providing appropriate care to meet these needs.

Support plans were developed including information on the person’s background, support needs and activities they enjoyed.