• Dentist
  • Dentist

Vikanna Services Ltd

16 - 18 Central Chambers, Ealing, London, W5 2NR (020) 8123 9654

Provided and run by:
Vikanna Services Limited

All Inspections

17 May 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced inspection on 17 May 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we asked the following questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.


Vikanna Services Ltd is in London Borough of Ealing and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

The dental team includes the registered manager, four dentists, one qualified dental nurse, two trainee dental nurses and a receptionist. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist, two trainee dental nurses, and the practice compliance manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday to Saturday from 10.00 am to 8.00 pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • There were systems in place to reduce the risks associated with the transmission of Covid-19.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had suitable safeguarding processes and staff were aware of their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • Staff recruitment procedures reflected current legislation.
  • Clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

26 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people using the service who told us they were satisfied with the way the practice was run and the treatments provided. They told us that treatment options, the costs and any potential risks were explained to them before any treatment was carried out. People's comments included 'the dentist understands and explains everything, I'm pretty happy with the service' and 'it's all good, they are very skilled.' Another person said 'it's important they speak my language so that I can explain things and understand what needs to be done.'

People told us they were treated with dignity and respect by staff. They said staff observed their right to privacy and the practice was always clean and tidy.

The provider had infection control systems in place and procedures were followed and recorded.

The provider followed staff recruitment procedures to make sure that appropriate staff were appointed. However, references were not available for all staff working in the practice

There were effective systems in place for managing complaints.