• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Skills Support Limited - Doncaster

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

Askern House, High Street, Askern, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN6 0AA (01302) 701744

Provided and run by:
Skills Support Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Skills Support Limited - Doncaster on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Skills Support Limited - Doncaster, you can give feedback on this service.

21 November 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Skills Support Limited – Doncaster provide support to people living in their own home who have a learning disability, autism and mental health conditions. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The service was exceptionally flexible and responsive to peoples changing needs. Staff were committed to providing outstanding person-centred care that enabled people to live a full, active and meaningful life.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were treated with dignity and respect and staff went over and above to support people flexibly to meet their needs. The provider was passionate about empowering people and people were treated with compassion and kindness. Staff provided excellent social and emotional support.

People received an extremely personalised and bespoke service, which was tailor made to meet their complex needs and preferences. People were central to the care and support they received and their decisions about their care were valued.

There was a complaints procedure in place. There were very robust and high-quality governance systems in place to assess and monitor the service provided. The service had continued to improve since our last inspection.

People's views were extremely valued and used to drive improvement. Risks in people's daily lives were assessed and mitigated. Staff were provided with safeguarding training and understood how to keep people safe.

Recruitment of staff was completed safely and there were sufficient staff numbers to provide the care and support required by people to meet their needs.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

The last rating for this service was good (published 27 June 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

23 May 2017

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 23 May 2017, with the provider being given short notice of the visit to the office in line with our current methodology for inspecting domiciliary care agencies. This was the first comprehensive inspection of the service under the current registration.

Skills Support Limited - Doncaster provides support to people living in their own home who have a learning disability. A small proportion of the support packages they provide include providing personal care to people.

The service had a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the time of our inspection there were four people who were receiving personal care from staff. We spoke with three people who used the service and two close relatives. When we asked people about their experiences of using the agency they indicated that they were very happy with the service provided.

There were systems in place to reduce the risk of abuse, and to assess and monitor potential risks to individual people. The provider acted appropriately where people were suspected to be at risk of harm. For instance, we saw potential risks to people had been assessed to ensure the environment was safe for people to live and work in, and to enable people to access the community safely.

People’s needs had been assessed before their care package commenced and where possible they, and the relatives, if appropriate, had been involved in formulating their support plans. Records identified people’s needs and preferences in good detail and had been reviewed and updated as needed.

People were encouraged to manage their own medication if they were able to, and some people were supported by their close family. However, when assistance was required to ensure people received the correct medication, at the right time, appropriate levels of support were provided.

We found recruitment processes were thorough, which helped the employer make safer recruitment decisions when employing new staff. There was sufficient trained and experienced staff employed to ensure people received support from staff who knew them well. People we spoke with confirmed they, or their family member received consistent support from the same care team.

People were enabled to raise any concerns or complaints. The complaints procedure told people how to raise a concern and how it would be addressed. This information was also available in a pictorial [easy to read and understand] format. Relatives we spoke with said they had not made any complaints, but were confident that any concerns they raised would be dealt with swiftly.

The registered manager had a clear oversight of the service, and of the people who were using it. People were encouraged to share their views about the quality of the care provided, to help drive up standards and influence change. Systems had been developed to monitor how the service operated and identify areas for improvement. This also gave the service an opportunity to learn from events and improve the service for people.