• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Goodwood Homecare

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

54 High Street, Bridgnorth, WV16 4DX (01746) 763406

Provided and run by:
Mrs Julie Elizabeth Claassen

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 12 February 2020

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team

One inspector and an Expert by Experience carried out this inspection. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.

The provider was also the manager and was present during our visit. This means that they, as the provider, are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because it is a domiciliary care provider and the provider is often out of the office supporting staff or providing care. We needed to be sure that they would be in.

Inspection site visit activity started on 14 January 2020 and ended on 16 January 2020. We visited the office location on 16 January 2020 to see the provider and staff; and to review care records, policies and procedures.

What we did before the inspection

The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report.

We asked the local authority and Healthwatch for any information they had which would aid our inspection. Local authorities together with other agencies may have responsibility for funding people who used the service and monitoring its quality. Healthwatch is an independent consumer champion that gathers and represents the views of the public about health and social care services in England. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with seven people who used the service and four relatives about their experience of the care provided. In total we spoke with seven staff members including the provider, senior carers, team leaders and care staff.

We reviewed a range of records. This included four people’s care records and records of medicines administration. In addition, we looked at a variety of records relating to the management of the service, including quality monitoring checks and we confirmed the safe recruitment of staff members.

Overall inspection

Requires improvement

Updated 12 February 2020

About the service

Goodwood Homecare is a domiciliary care agency that provides personal care and support to people living in their own homes. It provides a service to older adults some of whom are living with dementia.

Not everyone using Goodwood Homecare received a regulated activity. CQC only inspects the service received by people provided with 'personal care': for example, help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection 27 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were not always supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and the provider did not always support them in the least restrictive way possible or in their best interests; the application of the policies and systems was inconsistent and did not always support good practice.

The provider had quality monitoring procedures in place. However, these did not identify appropriate assessments of capacity to make decisions were not completed when necessary.

People were protected from the risks of ill-treatment and abuse as the staff team had been trained to recognise potential signs of abuse and understood what to do to safely support people. The provider had assessed the risks to people associated with their care and support. Staff members were knowledgeable about these risks and knew what to do to minimise the potential for harm to people.

People received safe support with their medicines by staff members who had been trained and assessed as competent. Staff members followed effective infection prevention and control procedures when supporting people.

The provider supported staff in providing effective care for people through person-centred care planning, training and one-to-one supervision. People were supported to refer themselves to additional healthcare services when required.

People received help and support from a kind and compassionate staff team with whom they had developed positive relationships. People were supported by staff members who were aware of their individual protected characteristics like age, gender and disability.

People were provided with information in a way they could understand. The provider had systems in place to encourage and respond to any compliments or complaints from people or those close to them. The provider, and management team, had good links with the local communities within which people lived.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was ‘Good’ overall with ‘Requires Improvement’ in the key question ‘Well-Led,” (published 11 July 2017). At this inspection we found improvements were still needed in this key question.

Enforcement

We have identified one breach of regulations in relation to obtaining consent for care. Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.