• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Social Care Solutions Ltd (Bedford & Northampton)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

67 Harpur Street, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK40 2SR (01234) 262650

Provided and run by:
Social Care Solutions Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

23 & 28 July 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on the 23 and 28 July 2015 and was unannounced.

Social Care Solutions LTD (Bedford) provides an outreach and supported living service, providing care and support to adults and children (not under 4 years of age) who may have a range of needs These include learning disabilities, autistic spectrum disorders, physical disabilities, mental health and sensory impairments. At the time of this inspection 46 people were using the service, with some living in shared accommodation.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

In November 2014, a new provider - Lifeways Community Care Limited, acquired the Care Solutions Group, which included this service.

People felt safe and staff had been trained to recognise signs of potential abuse.

Processes were in place to manage identifiable risks within the service and ensure people did not have their freedom unnecessarily restricted.

There were sufficient numbers of staff who had the right skills and knowledge to meet people’s needs.

The provider carried out robust recruitment checks on new staff to make sure they were suitable to work at the service.

Systems were in place to ensure people’s medicines were managed in a safe way; and that they got their medication when they needed it. People were encouraged to manage their own medication on a risk assessed basis.

Staff had received training to carry out their roles and meet people’s needs.

We found that the service worked to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 key principles. These state that a person's capacity should always be assumed, and assessments of capacity must be undertaken where it is believed that a person cannot make decisions about their care and support.

People had enough to eat and drink. Staff supported people to do their own food shopping and cooking as far as possible.

The service had developed positive working relationships with external healthcare professionals, to ensure effective arrangements were in place to meet people’s healthcare needs.

Staff were motivated and provided care and support in a caring and meaningful way. They treated people with kindness and compassion, and respected their privacy and dignity at all times.

We saw that people were given regular opportunities to express their views on the service they received. They were actively involved in influencing how the organisation works, as well as making decisions about their individual care and support needs.

People’s social needs were provided for and they were given regular opportunities to participate in meaningful activities in their own homes or within the local community.

People were encouraged to be as independent as possible.

A complaints procedure had been developed to let people know how to raise concerns about the service if they needed to.

Systems were also in place to monitor the quality of the service provided and to drive continuous improvement.

4 April 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We visited Social Care Solutions (Bedford) on 04 April 2013 to review improvements made within the service following the enforcement action we took against the provider in February 2013.

We spoke with three of the seven people who were currently using the service. People told us they had noticed improvements and said that staff were kinder, polite and listened to them more. People we spoke with expressed happiness and contentment with the care staff and their living environment.

We looked at three care files for people using the service. We saw that each person's care plan and risk assessments had recently been reviewed and changes had been made. People we spoke with during this visit confirmed that they had recently been involved in reviewing their care plans and behaviour management plans.

We spoke with three staff working at the service, including a newly appointed team leader. Staff informed us they had recently completed safeguarding training for vulnerable adults, whistleblowing, understanding challenging behaviour and non-abusive psychological and physical intervention (NAPPI) training. A staff member told us they had noticed a positive improvement in the past month particularly with regards to communication between staff and people using the service. This person felt there was more respect from care staff towards people using the service.

21 February 2013

During an inspection in response to concerns

We visited the office for Social Care Solutions to look at records for people using the service. We also visited one of the supported living schemes to talk to people using the service and staff who worked there.

We spoke with four of the seven people living at the service, two of whom told us they were happy living at the scheme. One of these two people described an incident to us which had caused them upset. A third person described inconsistent behaviours of staff that had caused them confusion and distress.

We also spoke with three members of staff. We found that not all staff were aware of their specific role and responsibilities in relation to safeguarding vulnerable adults from abuse. Records and discussions with staff and people who used the service highlighted that there had been numerous incidents of aggressive behaviour between people using the service. These represented a clear safeguarding and protection risk. However these had not been appropriately reported to the Care Quality Commission or to the Bedford Borough Council safeguarding team.

Records we looked at showed that people using the service had not always been involved in making decisions about their behaviour management plans or strategies to make them feel safe in their environment or from other people using the service.

13 August 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke to six people using the service or their representative. All those we spoke with told us they were currently happy with the care and support given to them. One person told us things had improved recently and they now had consistency of carers for their relative.

Everyone we spoke with told us they felt confident that if they had any concerns they could raise them with the management and felt assured they would be listened to.

One person using the service told us they were thankful for the care they received for their relative and thanks to the staff their life had been made much easier.

Five people we spoke with told us they felt the staff were skilled and knowledgeable.

5, 20 April 2011

During a routine inspection

People we talked with during our visit on 20 April 2011 told us that in general they felt listened to, respected and involved.

They told us that staff were understanding, and respected decisions made by them about their lives.

One person told us that it was a 'very good run team' and another said that the staff were 'absolutely lovely' and that they had been 'pleasantly surprised' by their capabilities.

One person told us that they had only recently begun to receive a service from the agency, but they did not know who to contact if they had a concern.