• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Reablement Provider Service

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

Neville Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE5 4PW (0116) 454 5422

Provided and run by:
Leicester City Council

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment 8 to 12 December 2025.

The Reablement Provider Service is a domiciliary care agency providing short term reablement, rehabilitation and recovery, and is part of the local authorities ‘home first model’, which works with established partner organisations in supporting people to remain in their own home. The service enables people to gain as much as independence as possible to facilitate their continued living at home. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. The CQC only inspect where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks relating to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our assessment 113 people were being supported.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. However, at the time of the inspection, no person with a learning disability or autistic person was receiving care and support.

The provider, registered manager, management team and staff worked collaboratively with key partner stakeholders and agencies from both health and social care to deliver a cohesive, dynamic and responsive service. All those involved were committed to people’s recovery, reablement and rehabilitation, maximising the potential of people remaining in their own home, with good quality of life outcomes. Key partner stakeholders and agencies from both health and social care were unequivocally positive about the Reablement Provider Service.

The Reablement Provider Services collaborative approach with partner stakeholders and agencies, ensured a co-ordinated transition of people’s care between services. Comprehensive assessments identifying people’s needs and risk were undertaken to facilitate safe and effective care, with a focus on the person and their home. Potential risks were minimised in consultation with people and a proactive approach to positive risk-taking facilitated recovery, reablement and rehabilitation.

People’s care records provided a comprehensive account as to their progress in the goals identified in consultation with them, ensuring people remained at the heart of any decisions relating to their recovery, reablement and rehabilitation. Records evidenced staffs’ collaborative approach, which included referrals to other services and working alongside other professionals to ensure and promote the delivery of safe, effective and responsive care.

The provider’s ethos towards care was embedded across the workforce. People’s recovery, reablement and rehabilitation was facilitated by staff who had undergone a safe recruitment process, and who had the training, skills and knowledge to facilitate good outcomes for people. Training for staff also considered specific areas of people’s needs, which included dementia, learning disabilities and autistic people.

The provider and registered manager were committed to providing a non-discriminatory and inclusive approach within the service, both for people using the service and staff, underpinned by robust strategies, which outlined the provider’s commitment to equality, diversion and inclusion.

The registered manager and management team were capable and inclusive leaders and managed a dedicated team of staff. Continuous development of the service was facilitated by a learning culture, underpinned by systems and processes which kept under review the quality and safety of the service provided. People’s views, and those of staff, key stakeholders and partner agencies were central to learning and innovation.

Staff well-being was considered a high priority by the registered manager who had facilitated well-being sessions, recognising the positive outcome of people using the service, when staff were supported and valued. Staff were consistently positive of the registered manager’s and management team responsiveness, support and good communication.

The collaborative approach of working with key partner stakeholders and agencies, facilitated by the registered manager, provided an overview of the wider landscape of health and social care services, enabling the service to respond to wider system pressures.

29 June 2017

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 29 June 2017 and was announced. The provider was given 48 hours’ notice because the location provides domiciliary care and we needed to be sure that someone would be at the office.

Leicester City Council’s Reablement Service is a domiciliary care service which provides short-term personal care and support to people in their own home following discharge from hospital or whilst residing within the community. At the time of our inspection 109 people were receiving personal care and support from the service.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The rehabilitation of people was seen as a primary objective of the Leicester City Council Domiciliary Care Service. People received care and support that was exceptionally well planned and carried out to meet their individual requirements. This included collaboratively working with other professionals to meet people’s specific requirements. People’s care and support was reviewed with them to make sure that their goals and aspirations were being met and that they were satisfied with their support. People and their relatives knew how to make a complaint and there were opportunities for them to provide feedback. The provider responded to any complaints received and took action to make improvements where this was required.

People received care from staff that was compassionate kind and supportive. People’s independence was promoted and staff actively encouraged people to retain or regain their skills. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity and involved them in decisions about their care. Staff built relationships with the people they supported based on information they had gained about things that mattered to them.

People felt safe with the support they received. Staff knew how to help people to remain safe and what action to take should they have concerns about a person being at risk of abuse or harm. Staff had assessed risks associated with people’s care and support. Staff had guidance and procedures to follow to make sure people received support in the event of an accident, injury or emergency. The provider had ensured communication with staff had been improved. Staff had been provided with individual hand held devices which allowed them to receive individual communications about the people they cared for, their training and ensured their safety when working alone. People received their medicines as prescribed and safe systems were in place to manage people’s medicines.

Recruitment procedures ensured suitable staff were employed to work with people who used the service. Staff told us they had received training that had helped them to understand and support people’s individual needs. Staff were aware of people’s eating and drinking requirements and took action where they were concerned about people’s health.

The registered manager understood their responsibility to comply with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Staff were aware of people’s capacity to make decisions and people were asked for their consent before care and support was undertaken.

People, their relatives, healthcare professionals and staff all highly commended the service. There were open channels of communication and the registered manager was open, supportive and available. The registered manager was knowledgeable about their role and used healthcare information to drive improvements in the service. The provider had recruited a suitable number of staff to make sure that people received the care they required when they needed it.

Staff were aware of their responsibilities which included working to the provider’s aims and objectives. They received guidance, detailed feedback and praise about their work which recognised the high quality care they provided. The registered manager undertook their duties in line with their registration requirements with CQC. They had carried out or arranged for quality checks of the service. This continuously drove improvements and the efficiency of the service.