You are here

Archived: Burley's Home Care Services Limited Good

This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile


Inspection carried out on 18 February 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection was announced and took place on the 18 February 2015.

Burley’s Home Care Services provides personal care and support to people who live in their own homes. At the time of the inspection they were providing personal care to 46 people.

Burley’s Home Care Services has a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have a legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People using the service told us that they felt safe. Safeguarding training and procedures were in place and care workers were able to identify and recognise signs of abuse. Personalised risk assessments in people’s care plans detailed actions that needed to be taken to ensure a person’s safety when care was being delivered.

There were enough staff to meet people’s needs and there were contingency plans in place in the event that a care worker was delayed or unable to deliver care. The service had purchased a company car for care workers to use, if required, to ensure continuity of care for people using the service.

We found that thorough staff recruitment procedures were in place so that people were protected from the employment of unsuitable staff. Interviews were conducted in order to establish a care workers professional and personal suitability for the role.

Members of staff responsible for the administration of medicines had received additional training to ensure that people’s medicines were being managed correctly.

Care workers understood person centred care and were assisted by management and training to deliver this. Care workers received robust training which made them feel competent in delivering care. Staff had also received training about the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and were able to discuss what a change in a person’s capacity meant for their day to day decision making.

People’s nutritional needs were met by staff with an understanding of their preferences and food was prepared to a high standard.

When people’s additional health care needs were identified the registered manager engaged with other health and social care agencies and professionals to maintain people’s safety and welfare.

People told us that their care was provided to a high standard. The registered manager and care workers were able to identify and discuss the importance of maintaining people’s respect and privacy at all times. This included taking time to build a personal rapport with a person using the service to install confidence in their abilities.

Care plans were personalised to each individual and contained detailed information to assist care workers to provide care in a manner that respected that person’s individual needs and wishes. Relatives were involved at the care planning stage and during regular reviews.

The registered manager’s vision and values were communicated to care workers.

Quality assurance processes were in place to gather, capture and then respond to concerns when they were received. People told us that their feedback was welcomed and issues addressed when required.

People knew there was an on call service in an emergency. Care workers felt supported by this service especially at weekends or out of hours.

Inspection carried out on 1 October 2013

During a routine inspection

The agency was providing personal care to 23 people at the time of our inspection. They also provided unregulated support such as help with domestic tasks and shopping to other people.

Everyone we spoke with was happy with the care that they, or their relative, received. People told us the service was reliable and responsive and care was planned and delivered appropriately.

People told us they felt safe. Staff knew how to respond appropriately to alleged abuse.

The agency had a robust system of quality assurance in place to monitor and improve the service.

Complaints were managed appropriately and the service was responsive to people�s views.

Inspection carried out on 19 March 2013

During a routine inspection

People were protected against the risks associated with medicines because the provider had appropriate arrangements in place to manage medicines. Although we found that one care plan had conflicting information about the level of support needed with a person�s medication.

We found that people were cared for by staff who were supported to deliver care and treatment safely and to an appropriate standard. Staff told us they felt supported by the agency. One care worker told us: �Whenever we go to a new person, the manager always goes with me to see if I am ok.�

People�s views and experiences were taken into account in the way the service was provided and delivered in relation to their care. One relative of a person who received services form the agency told us that they found that care planning from the agency was, �All about the person not about fees.�

People experienced care, treatment and support that met their needs and protected their rights. One person told us: �Each time I see carers I say oh good. They are kind, good and have a sense of humour.�

Another person told us: �They are excellent.�

We found that there was an effective complaints system available and comments and complaints people made were responded to appropriately.