You are here

Inspection Summary


Overall summary & rating

Good

Updated 22 September 2017

K and J Carers registered with the Commission in April 2016. This was the first inspection of the service.

This inspection took place on 7,8 and 13 September 2017. K and J Carers is a domiciliary service providing care, support and companionship to people in their own homes. 72 hours’ notice was given as the service is small and we needed to be sure the registered manager would be available when we visited the agency offices. This time also enabled the registered manager to arrange home visits. This allowed us to hear about people’s experiences of the service.

At the time of the inspection, the service was providing personal care to 10 people.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People and their relatives told us staff were caring and kind. Staff demonstrated kindness and compassion for people through their conversations and interactions. People’s privacy and dignity was promoted. People were actively involved in making choices and decisions about how they wanted to live their lives. People were protected from abuse because staff understood what action to take if they were concerned someone was being abused or mistreated.

People received care which was responsive to their needs. People and their relatives were encouraged to be part of the care planning process and to attend or contribute to care reviews where possible. This helped to ensure the care being provided met people’s individual needs and preferences. Support plans were personalised and guided staff to help people in the way they liked.

Risks associated with people’s care were effectively managed to ensure their freedom was promoted. People were supported by consistent staff to help meet their needs. The registered manager / provider wanted to ensure the right staff were employed, so recruitment practices were safe and ensured that checks had been undertaken. People’s medicines were managed safely.

People received care from staff who had undertaken training to be able to meet their unique needs. People’s human rights were protected because the registered manager and staff had an understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). People’s nutritional needs were met because staff followed people’s support plans to make sure people were eating and drinking enough and potential risks were known. People were supported to access health care professionals to maintain their health and wellbeing.

The service was well led by a registered manager / provider and supported by a small, dedicated team. There were quality assurance systems in place to help assess the ongoing quality of the service, and to help identify any areas which might require improvement. The registered manager and provider promoted the ethos of honesty, learned from mistakes and admitted when things had gone wrong. The service was constantly striving to improve.

Inspection areas

Safe

Good

Updated 22 September 2017

The service was safe.

People were protected by safe recruitment practices and there were sufficient numbers of skilled and experienced staff to meet people�s needs.

People were protected by staff who understood and managed risk. People were supported to have as much control and independence as possible.

People had their medicines managed safely.

People were protected from the spread of infection, because safe practices were in place to minimise any associated risks.

People were protected from avoidable harm and abuse.

Effective

Good

Updated 22 September 2017

The service was effective. People received support from staff who knew them well and had the knowledge and skills to meet their needs.

Staff were well supported and had the opportunity to reflect on practice and training needs.

Staff had a good understanding of the Mental Capacity Act and promoted choice and independence whenever possible.

Caring

Good

Updated 22 September 2017

The service was caring.

People and their relatives were positive about the service and the way staff treated the people they supported.

Staff were kind and compassionate and treated people with respect.

Staff supported people to improve their lives by promoting their independence and wellbeing.

Responsive

Good

Updated 22 September 2017

The service was responsive.

Care records were written to reflect people�s individual needs and were regularly reviewed and updated.

People received personalised care and support, which was responsive to their changing needs.

People were involved in the planning of their care and their views and wishes were listened to and acted on.

People knew how to make a complaint and raise any concerns. People had no concerns.

Well-led

Good

Updated 22 September 2017

The service was well led.

There was a positive culture in the service. The management team provided strong leadership and led by example.

The provider/registered manager had clear visions and values about how they wished the service to be provided and these values were understood and shared with the staff team.

People and those important to them were involved in discussions about the service and their views were valued.

Staff were motivated and inspired to develop and provide quality care.

Quality assurance systems drove improvement and raised standards of care.