• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Housing & Care 21 - Louth

7 Albion Place, Louth, Lincolnshire, LN11 9AE 0303 123 1251

Provided and run by:
Housing 21

All Inspections

3 October 2013

During a routine inspection

People said they were asked what help they required and how they wanted to be supported. We saw people were involved in creating and reviewing their care plans.

Care plans were written in a way that promoted the individual's choice and independence. They gave clear guidance for care workers on how the care and support should be given.

We visited four people in their own homes. One person told us, 'I get very good care, my carer is lovely.' Another person said, 'They always come, I am extremely satisfied.'

We spoke with three care worker workers who said they felt they had enough time and support to care for people and meet their needs. The staff rotas showed there was only a limited amount of time for travelling to each community call; we were told sometimes this would cause them to be slightly late.

We saw training records which showed members of staff had received appropriate training for their role. In addition we saw records that indicated members of staff were encouraged to undertake a nationally recognised qualification in care.

We saw records of meetings with people by senior members of staff. These meetings served to address any concerns and issues people might have. We were told this provided useful feedback on the quality of the service provided by individual members of staff.

28 June 2013

During an inspection in response to concerns

We undertook this inspection in response to concerns raised anonymously by a member of the public. The concerns raised centred on the levels of staffing the service was able to provide to meet all its clients' needs.

We looked at how staff were deployed throughout the wide area the service covered. We saw that people who used the service were grouped into geographical areas and teams of staff were aligned to each group.

We saw the staff rotas matched the daily logs; the correct staff member attended the appointment and people were supported at the agreed time. We also noted two members of staff were always provided.

We went to the house of a person using the service. We saw the appropriate member of staff arrived on time and was well presented. The person who received the care told us, 'They always come when I need them, they never miss. I am happy with the staff.'

18 April 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We visited the Elizabeth Court, the extra housing facility to follow up improvements since our last visit in November 2012.

People were protected against the risks associated with medicines because the provider had improved arrangements in place to manage medicines. We found improvements had been made to the quality and accuracy of the care and medication administration records. Care workers had received further training on medication. Detailed medication risk assessments had been completed. Care plans recorded people's medication. The manager had carried out more frequent audits of the care and medication records with positive results.

We found the systems to identify, assess and manage risks to the health, safety and welfare of people who used the service were more robust and effective. Staff had received training in safeguarding people and health and safety. Courses on risk management were scheduled. People's care records had been reviewed. A staff restructuring programme had taken place. Effective auditing programmes were in place.

13, 16 November 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

As part of this inspection we spoke with one person who used the service. The person told us the care workers gave them their medicines which they took out of the blister packs prepared by the pharmacist. They also said staff helped them with other medicines such as creams and always observed the medicine administration. We found the recording of medicines was inconsistent and the issues had not been identified and improved through effective auditing systems.

The person told us they were happy with the care they received.

15 June 2012

During a routine inspection

We asked people to tell us what it was like to receive services from this home care agency. We spoke with fifteen people who used the services. We used telephone interviews and visited five people who use the service at their home. We also spoke with their main carers (a relative or friend) to gain views about the service.

Everyone we spoke with told us the care workers treated them with respect and they felt their dignity was protected. One person said, 'Absolutely, carers always respect my wishes, they are very nice and polite." Another person said, "Yes they do respect my privacy, always cover me up when they help me with personal care.' Relatives we spoke with confirmed the carers were respectful towards their family members. One relative told us, "They respect my husband's privacy and dignity, always so kind and gentle with him.'

All people we spoke with were complimentary about the staff, some of the comments made to us included, "They couldn't be kinder" and "They are always happy and always smiling."

8 December 2011

During a routine inspection

We spoke with people who received care from staff who were based in the community. They said they were very happy with the care, they said the staff met their needs and seemed competent. They told us there were regular checks on the quality of care being delivered and said they felt safe with the staff.

The people we spoke with who lived in an extra care unit gave a very different view of the service. They said that the staff often came in without knowing their needs and had to ask them what help was needed. They said they experienced late or missed calls, and said the staff sometimes rushed them or were impatient.

People told us the quality of staff was variable, and that some staff lacked compassion. They raised concerns about the approach of some staff. The people we spoke with told us that the recording of medicines was not always safe and they said the senior carers were not supportive towards the staff. They said they were not asked for their views on care and had never seen the manager. We had very serious concerns about this part of the service.