• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

AMG Nursing and Care Services - Stafford and Stoke-on-Trent

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Ruby House, Stone Business Park, Brooms Road, Stone, Staffordshire, ST15 0SH (01785) 608200

Provided and run by:
AMG Consultancy Services Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about AMG Nursing and Care Services - Stafford and Stoke-on-Trent on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about AMG Nursing and Care Services - Stafford and Stoke-on-Trent, you can give feedback on this service.

15 February 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

AMG Nursing and Care Services (Stafford and Stoke-on-Trent) is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care and support to people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of inspection, 45 people were receiving a regulated service, the majority of people were receiving longer care calls, with some receiving 24-hour support.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Right Support:

People were supported to be involved in their care and to manage their own risks. However, we have made a recommendation to the provider to review the documentation and recording of people’s pain management.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were supported by trained staff. People told us staff arrived on time and stayed for the designated duration of time.

Staff supported people with their medicines safely. Robust quality audits ensured people’s medicines were monitored and reviewed in a timely manner.

Right Care:

Staff understood how to protect people from abuse. The provider worked well with other agencies to do so. Staff received safeguarding training and they told us how they would report any concerns to their manager.

The provider had enough appropriately skilled staff to meet people’s needs and keep them safe. Staff had been recruited safely and all relevant pre-employment checks had been undertaken.

People’s care plans reflected their range of support requirements. Staff knew people well and could tell us about people’s preferences and how these could be met safely.

Right Culture:

People’s quality of life was enhanced by the provider’s culture of improvement and inclusivity. People could choose to be involved in the recruitment process, ensuring they could express their opinions and choices regarding the staff who would be supporting them.

Each person was supported by a team of staff who regularly engaged in person specific team meetings to discuss the care and support required. People and relatives were invited to attend the meetings.

The provider evaluated the quality of support provided to people, involving the person, their families and other professionals as appropriate. People, relatives and staff received questionnaires in order to provide feedback on the care and support provided.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 09 January 2020)

Why we inspected

We received concerns relating to training of staff, care planning and incident recording. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of safe and well-led only.

We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from these concerns. Please see the safe and well led sections of this full report.

For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating.

The overall rating for the service has not changed. The service remains good based on the findings of this inspection.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

4 November 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

AMG Nursing and Care Services - Stafford and Stoke on Trent is a domiciliary care agency that provides personal care and support to people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of inspection 39 people were receiving a regulated service. Whilst there were some people receiving a traditional domiciliary care service of calls of an hour or less per day, the majority of people were receiving care over longer periods of time, with some receiving 24 hour support.

People's experience of using this service and what we found

People and their relatives told us they felt safe and staff knew how to identify and report concerns relating to people's safety. Risks were assessed and managed to reduce the risk of avoidable harm. Systems used for the management of medicines were safe and people received their medicines as prescribed.

People's needs were assessed prior to receiving support and reviewed to ensure their care needs were met. Staff sought consent before providing care and decisions about people's care and treatment were made in line with law. Staff received training and felt supported by the management team. People received sufficient amounts to eat and drink to maintain their health. People were supported to access healthcare agencies when needed.

People were supported by a caring staff team and supported to maintain their dignity and independence.

People, and those close to them, were involved in the assessment and planning of their care. People knew how to raise a concern if they were unhappy about the service they received.

People were supported to have choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this.

People, relatives and staff felt the service was well managed. People, relatives and staff were given opportunities to share their views about the service. The registered manager carried out various audits to ensure the quality of the care provided.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at the last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 4 May 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our reinspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

4 April 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 4 April 2017 and was announced. AMG Nursing and Care Services provide specialist nursing care and personal care for people of any age in their own homes. At this inspection they were providing care and support for 78 people.

A registered manager was in post and present during our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the

Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were safe from harm as staff had been trained and knew how to recognise and respond to signs of abuse. Staff had access to care plans and risk assessments and knew how to protect people from risks of harm associated with their care. Any incidents and accidents were thoroughly investigated to identify any trends and learning. This minimised the risk of reoccurrence.

The provider completed checks on staff before they started work to ensure they were safe to work with people. People received support with their medicine from staff who were trained to safely administer or prompt people to take it. The provider undertook regular competency checks on staff to ensure they followed safe practice when supporting people with their medicine.

People were supported by staff that had the skills and knowledge to meet their needs well. Staff attended training that was relevant and specific to the people they supported. Staff received support and guidance from a management team who they found approachable. Staff members felt listened to by the provider and that their suggestions and experiences mattered to them.

People were involved in decisions about their care and were involved in the planning of their support. People had information they needed in a way they understood. When people could not make decisions for themselves staff understood the steps they needed to follow to ensure people's rights were upheld.

People had good relationships with the staff who supported them. Staff knew people's personal likes and dislikes and things that were important to them. People had their privacy and dignity respected and information personal to them was treated in confidence.

People were supported to have access to healthcare when they needed it. Staff responded to any changes in need promptly and consistently.

People and staff felt able to express their views and felt their opinions mattered. People felt able to raise any concerns and were confident these would be investigated. People received feedback after any concerns were raised. The provider undertook regular quality checks in order to improve the service. The provider engaged people and their families and encouraged feedback.