• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Dimensions Essex and Suffolk Domiciliary Care Office

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2 River House, Chalkstone Way, Haverhill, CB9 0BF 0300 303 9004

Provided and run by:
Dimensions (UK) Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Dimensions Essex and Suffolk Domiciliary Care Office on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Dimensions Essex and Suffolk Domiciliary Care Office, you can give feedback on this service.

3 October 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Dimensions Colchester Domiciliary Care Office is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection the service was supporting a total of 100 people. Ninety-four people received support with personal care.

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People using the service were supported to stay safe. Staff had good understanding of safeguarding procedures and how to report concerns. Risks to people, including the spread of infection were assessed and managed well. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence. The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. The introduction of ‘Active Support’ a model of care developed in conjunction with the University of Kent and The Behaviour Foundation provided support to people which focused on them having as many opportunities as possible to gain new skills and become more independent.

Sufficient numbers of staff were employed and adjusted when needed to meet people’s complex needs. The recruitment, induction and training processes in place ensured staff had the right skills and experience and were suitable to work with people who used the service.

Systems were in place to ensure people’s medicines were managed safely, including working towards reducing people’s psychotropic medicines. These are medicines that affect the mind, emotions, and behaviour. The organisation had implemented campaigns designed to improve outcomes for people using the service. ‘I’m with Sam’ promoted awareness of dealing with and tackling hate crimes against people with a learning disability and autism, and ‘My GP and me campaign’ was designed to improve outcomes for people with learning disabilities or autism when visiting their GP.

People using the service were cared for by staff that knew them well. People had access to food and drink of their choice and were supported to live a healthy lifestyle. Staff worked well with other professionals to ensure continuity of care and support to people when moving between services. People’s privacy, dignity and independence was promoted and respected. People’s communication needs had been assessed and were meeting the requirements of the Accessible Information Standards. This set of standards sets out the specific, approach for providers of health and social care to meet the communication needs of people with a disability, impairment or sensory loss.

Work was in progress to develop end of life care plans to ensure people’s wishes will be considered at such time, and ensure they experience a pain free and comfortable death.

Staff were aware of the vison and values of the company, and intuitively applied these in their day to day roles ensuring person received person centred care. People, their relatives and staff were involved in the service, and feedback was used to improve the service provided.

Systems were in place to assess the quality of the service and ensure risks and regulatory requirements were being understood and managed. Where things had gone wrong, the registered manager took quick and appropriate action to put things right. Systems were in place to learn from incidents and improvements made. The provider had a range of ways to engage with people and their families to ensure they were involved in how the service was ran. This included annual regional events and involving people who used the service as ‘quality checkers’ to have oversight of the services provided, and involving them in the recruitment of staff.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good (published 10 January 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

14 November 2016

During a routine inspection

Dimensions provides a supported living service and provides personal care for people who are unable to provide it for themselves, because of old age, illness or disability. A supportive living service is where people are supported to live in their own home and receive personal care and support that promotes their independence as there is a separation between the care and accommodation, the care they receive is regulated by the CQC but the accommodation is not. On the day of our inspection, 72 people were using the service. Some of the people using the service had complex needs and the frequency of the care and support depended on people’s individual requirements.

A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

There were enough staff to meet people’s needs and to manage risk safely. Systems were in place so people could take their prescribed medicines safely. The Registered Manager had a robust recruitment process, which helped protect people from the risk of avoidable harm, and staff were supported to develop their skills and knowledge.

People's consent was obtained before any care was provided and the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 were met. Everyone told us staff members always asked their permission before carrying out any care tasks. People were supported to consume food and drink of their choice and if the person was able, staff supported and encouraged them to assist with meal preparation. Staff worked well with health care professionals, to ensure people maximised their health and wellbeing.

Staff had spent time developing positive relationships with people and knew them well. Support was given to people in a personalised way that responded to the changes in people’s lives. Guidance was in place to enable staff to provide a consistent and safe level of support. People and their relatives told us they were aware of how to make a complaint and that they felt they were listened to by the registered manager.

Staff were enthusiastic about working for the service and worked well as a team. The service had a robust approach to monitoring and improving the quality of the service and carried out regular audits to assure the quality of the service being delivered.