• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: All Saints Dental Clinic

9 All Saint Road, Westbourne Park, London, W11 1HA (020) 7727 8328

Provided and run by:
Dr Dennis Li Tai Leong

All Inspections

10 December 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a focused inspection on 10 December 2020 which included a review of evidence submitted to us by the provider before the site visit. This inspection was carried out to follow up on the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

Prior to our site visit we asked the provider to send us evidence of the improvements they had implemented. This allowed us to carry out a shorter site visit when we confirmed the required improvements to the service had been made.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was accompanied by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of All Saints Dental Clinic on 16 December 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing Safe, responsive or Well led care and was in breach of various regulations under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. These included Regulation 12 -Safe care and treatment, Regulation 13 -Safeguarding, Regulation 16 – Receiving Complaints, Regulation 17 - Good governance, Regulation 18 Staffing, Regulation 19 Fit and proper person employed. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for All Saints Dental Clinic on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it responsive?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 16 December 2019.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 16 December 2019.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 16 December 2019.

Background

All Saints Dental Clinic is in Kensington and provides NHS and private treatment for adults and children.

There are car parking spaces, including some for blue badge holders available near the practice.

The dental team includes a dentist, a dental nurse and a practice manager. The practice has one treatment room and a separate decontamination room

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

The practice is open at the following times:

Monday to Friday 10.00 am – 5.00 pm

Our key findings were:

There was evidence of servicing of equipment

There was evidence of up to date employer liability insurance

A dental sharps risk assessment had been carried out.

A five-year electrical safety certificate was available.

The practice had stopped using a wire brush to clean instruments as part of the decontamination and cleaning process.

There were system in place for receiving and acting on safety alerts.

Improvements had been made to the practice’s safeguarding procedures.

Improvements had been made to the complaint’s procedure and processes.

There were systems in place to ensure the appropriate recruitment of staff.

There were systems in place for the appraisal of staff.

The registered person had systems to assess, monitor and mitigate risks including audits, checks on cleaning, medicines and clinical waste.

16 December 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this unannounced inspection on 16 December 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was not providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

All Saints Dental Clinic is in Kensington, London and provides NHS and private treatment to adults and children.

There are car parking spaces, including some for blue badge holders available near the practice.

The dental team includes a dentist, a dental nurse and a practice manager. The practice has one treatment room and a separate decontamination room.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection, we received feedback from three patients.

During the inspection we spoke both with the dentist, the dental nurse and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be generally clean.

  • The dentist provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • The dentist provided preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider did not have an effective and accessible system for identifying, receiving, handling and responding to complaints from people using the service, people acting on their behalf or other stakeholders.
  • Staff had some understanding of how to deal with medical emergencies. However, some medicines and life-saving equipment were unavailable on the day of the inspection. These were procured immediately by the provider.
  • The provider did not have effective systems in place to manage risks such as for example, in regard to ensuring equipment used at the practice was regularly serviced.

The practice staff did not have effective understanding, awareness and access to policies to help identify and report abuse of service users.

  • The provider did not carry out all the required recruitment checks for staff employed.
  • The provider did not have systems in place to audit their non-clinical and clinical processes.
  • The provider did not have effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Ensure patients are protected from abuse and improper treatment.
  • Ensure there is an effective system for identifying, receiving, recording, handling and responding to complaints by patients and other persons in relation to the carrying on of the regulated activity.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure persons employed in the provision of the regulated activity receive the appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal necessary to enable them to carry out the duties.
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements.

They should:

  • Review the practice protocols regarding audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.
  • Review the practice protocols regarding auditing patient dental care records to check that necessary information is recorded.
  • Implement processes and systems for seeking and learning from patient and staff feedback with a view to monitoring and improving the quality of the service.

19 March 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two patients, who stated that they were satisfied with the care and treatment received. Patients felt that they had been given sufficient information about their care and treatment and one patient said that they were 'very happy' with the treatment received. A detailed medical history was taken for each person and any allergies or medical conditions were recorded and discussed during the appointment.

People were given aftercare advice following treatment, which included the emergency contact number for the dentist. There was emergency equipment available and staff had received basic life support training.

There were effective systems in place to reduce the risk of infection. Staff described the decontamination process to us and provided evidence to show that checks were carried out on the equipment used.

The necessary checks had been carried out on prospective employees before they could start work. The quality of the service was monitored and informal staff meetings took place to discuss feedback received from patients.