• Doctor
  • GP practice

Brunswick Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Surbiton Health Centre, Ewell Road, Surbiton, Surrey, KT6 6EZ

Provided and run by:
Brunswick Surgery

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Brunswick Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Brunswick Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

14 December 2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Brunswick Surgery on 14 December 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as good.

Safe - good

Effective - good

Caring - good

Responsive - good

Well-led - good

At our last inspection in 2015 we rated this service as good.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Brunswick Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out this inspection in line with our inspection priorities.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A short site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • What we found when we inspected.
  • Information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services.
  • Information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • Safeguarding processes kept patients safe.
  • Both premises were safely maintained and cleaned.
  • The practice was monitoring patients on high risk medicines and those with long-term conditions to ensure their safety.
  • There was a system in place to action safety alerts.
  • Staff were happy working at the practice and felt supported by the management team.
  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.

Although we didn’t find any breaches of regulations, the practice should:

  • Take steps to meet national targets for childhood immunisations and cervical cancer screening.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

30 June 2015

During an inspection of this service