• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: The Nightingale Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1 The Street, Framingham Earl, Norwich, Norfolk, NR14 7QY (01508) 500176

Provided and run by:
Nightingale Homecare Norfolk Ltd

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

30 July 2014

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2012, and to pilot a new inspection process being introduced by Care Quality Commission (CQC) which looks at the overall quality of the service.

The inspection was announced. This meant that the provider and managers knew that we were planning to carry out the inspection.

Our last scheduled inspection of this service was on 29 October 2013 where we found that all the standards we inspected had been met.

The Nightingale Centre is a domiciliary care agency that provides care and support to people living in their own homes. At the time of the inspection, 53 people were receiving care and support.

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service and shares the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law; as does the provider.

From our conversations with people and relatives it was evident the culture of the service was built around the person and their individual needs. People received care from kind and compassionate staff who understood their preferences and went out of their way to provide care and support that met their needs.

People who used the service and their relatives told us that they felt safe, listened to, that their independence was encouraged and that the staff were respectful to them. They also told us they found the staff and management approachable and could speak to them if they were concerned about anything and had confidence that their concerns would be dealt with.

Staff had been trained and had the skills and knowledge to provide support to the people they cared for. They understood the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 which meant they were working within the law to support people who may lack capacity to make their own decisions.

Staff helped people to access healthcare professionals when they became unwell or required specialist help. This included referral to other services such as the fire service, advocacy services or services to reduce the risk of social isolation to help improve people’s safety and quality of life.

The staff were happy working at the service and told us the management team and the provider were supportive, that they listened to them and that changes in care practice were implemented when concerns had been raised. The provider had taken steps to keep their knowledge about care and support services up to date so that they could implement best practice within the service and had invested in technology so they could monitor and improve the quality of the service they provided.

29 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with 12 people using the service or their representatives. All of them felt that the standard of care they received from this agency was very good. They felt that they were supported safely and that staff always checked whether there was anything else that needed doing before they finished their visit. They said that staff did not cut corners and did not rush them when their care needs were being attended to. One person said, "They do what I expect. They're all very good." Another added, "They always check that I am comfy and make sure I have everything to hand." One relative told us how they had been involved in rewriting their family member's care plan with them and the agency "...from start to finish..." so that they could have a say in determining what care was needed. This showed that the service was caring and responsive to people's needs.

The office accommodation and training rooms were well maintained and accessible to people with disabilities if required. Fire detection systems and extinguishing equipment were tested regularly to ensure their safety.

Staff were properly recruited with checks to ensure that they were safe to work with vulnerable people. They also received induction training and 'shadowing' shifts to ensure they understood how to meet people's needs. One person told us about new staff, that the manager "...checks up on them..." and "...doesn't just employ people and leave them to get on with it."

People had opportunities to comment on the quality of the service. One person told us, "The Nightingale Centre is a great asset. I couldn't give them lower than eight out of ten." Another described the agency as "...a small company with a big outlook. They do excel themselves."

People told us that they knew how to contact the office if they had any concerns or complaints. They were confident they would be listened to. One person said, "I am fussy and I would complain but I'm full of praise for them." Another person told us they felt that the office staff were approachable and said, "If I wasn't happy with the carers, the manager would sort it out." This helped to show the service was well led.

11 December 2012

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the service and felt that, if they had any concerns, matters were dealt with promptly. For example, one person told us, "They take note of my comments. I've never felt fobbed off." Another told us, "I would recommend them to anybody. I think they're an extremely good care company. I can't speak highly enough of them." People felt they were always informed of changes or any delays so that they did not worry about not receiving a visit. One person said, "Nothing ever happens that we don't know about. I can't think of anything bad to say about them, that speaks for itself I suppose."

People expressed their satisfaction with the care that they received, several singling out their regular carers. People described these staff in a variety of ways such as, "They're all fantastic." "They look after me pretty well." "I think we're lucky."

We found that staff had access to training and support to ensure that they knew how to work safely and that any concerns about their performance were addressed. The views and concerns of people using the service were also taken into account and responded to.

There were systems in place to help promote people's protection and to ensure that they felt safe with the staff who visited them.