We carried out a review of the data available to us about Newton Community Hospital Practice on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Newton Community Hospital Practice, you can give feedback on this service.
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Newton Community Hospital Practice on 26 September 2017. Overall the practice is rated as good. Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and report incidents and near misses. Significant events had been investigated and action had been taken as a result of the learning from events.
Systems were in place to deal with medical emergencies and staff were trained in basic life support.
There were systems in place to reduce risks to patient safety. For example, infection control practices were carried out appropriately and there were regular checks on the environment and on equipment used.
Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.
Feedback from patients about the care and treatment they received from clinicians was positive. Patients told us they were treated with dignity and respect and they were involved in decisions about their care and treatment.
Data showed that outcomes for patients at this practice were similar to outcomes for patients locally and nationally.
Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment and there was good continuity of care. The appointments system was flexible to accommodate the needs of patients. Urgent appointments were available the same day and routine appointments could be booked in advance.
The practice had good facilities, including disabled access. It was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
Information about services and how to complain was available. Complaints had been investigated and responded to in a timely manner.
There was a clear leadership and staff structure and staff understood their roles and responsibilities.
The practice had a clear vision to provide a safe and high quality service.
The practice provided a range of enhanced services to meet the needs of the local population.
The practice sought patient views about improvements that could be made to the service. This included the practice having and consulting with a patient participation group (PPG).
Chief Inspector of General Practice