• Dentist
  • Dentist

Cranbrook House Dental Practice

635 Cranbrook Road, Gants Hill, Ilford, Essex, IG2 6SX (020) 8550 4832

Provided and run by:
Dr. Jasminder Sharma

All Inspections

21 June 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 21 June 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Cranbrook House Dental Practice is in Ilford, in the London Borough of Redbridge. The practice provides private dental treatment to adults and children.

The practice is located on the ground floor in purpose-adapted premises. The practice has two treatment rooms, one of which was in use. The practice is located close to public transport services.

The dental team includes the principal dentist who owns the practice, a dental hygienist and a dental nurse. The clinical team are supported by a receptionist.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of our inspection we received feedback from 28 patients.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist and the receptionist. We checked practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Tuesdays and Thursdays between 9.30am and 5.30pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures in place.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The practice was providing preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice had arrangements to deal with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The practice had suitable information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the practice’s arrangements for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports issued from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and through the Central Alerting System (CAS), as well as from other relevant bodies, such as Public Health England (PHE).
  • Review the practice’s protocols to ensure audits of radiography and infection prevention and control are undertaken at regular intervals to improve the quality of the service. Practice should also ensure that, where appropriate, audits have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.
  • Review the practice’s protocols for conscious sedation; taking into account the guidelines published by The Intercollegiate Advisory Committee on Sedation in Dentistry in the document 'Standards for Conscious Sedation in the Provision of Dental Care 2015.

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

At our last inspection the practice was not able to produce evidence to demonstrate that the machines used for cleaning and sterilising the dental instruments had been serviced. We were susequently provided with documentation which demonstrated that people were now protected from the risk of infection because machines used to clean dental instruments had been properly maintained.

14 August 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with told us they were happy with the treatment that was provided and that staff were friendly and polite. Treatment options and their costs were clearly explained to people, enabling them to make informed treatment choices. Health assessments were updated at each visit so that the surgery was aware of any related conditions. Arrangements were in place to deal with emergencies if they were to arise. The surgery managed the control and prevention of infection appropriately. The surgery was clean and hygienic. We also found that records were accurate, fit for purpose and kept securely.