• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: 60 Five Rodney Street

65 Rodney Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L1 9EX (0151) 709 2203

Provided and run by:
Mrs Deborah Peterson and Ms Jacqueline Walters

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

24 April 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Our inspection of 7 March 2013 found that improvements were needed to the systems in place to record how the provider engaged with patients and the staff team. Improvements were also needed to maintain the security of the premises and to the recording around the monitoring undertaken to ensure patients were treated in a safe and hygienic environment.

Records showed the service had made changes to how they recorded information with regard to the monitoring of their infection control processes. A detailed environmental risk assessment was in place that had been regularly reviewed. A tour of the building showed work had been carried out to improve the security of the building and patients records.

The staff team had regular meeting and were supported to raise issues to support the improvement of the service.

7 March 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke privately with four patients who were attending the service for an appointment. All the patients were happy with the care they had received .Patients told us they were put at ease by the skill and experience demonstrated by the staff. Their comments included:

"I wouldn't go anywhere else".

"They are very caring and considerate".

"They understand my needs and anxieties".

"The hygienist is lovely, they know me so well, anything I am worried about we can talk about"

Patient's consent was gained at each treatment episode and people were happy that they had been given a choice of options with clear explanations of both treatment and costs.

The dental surgeries we looked at on the day of the visit were of a suitable size and were clean and well maintained. Each room was fully equipped and we observed staff carrying out cleaning procedures in between each patient, thus minimising the risk of cross infection.

We found that relevant checks had been carried on staff before they were allowed to work at the service.

During our visit we identified some improvements were required regarding the security of records.

The service was not able to provide robust evidence of effective quality monitoring systems.

You can see our judgements on the front page of this report.