• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

230-232 Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS (020) 7837 2905

Provided and run by:
The Assisted Conception Unit Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, you can give feedback on this service.

22 February 2022

During a routine inspection

We have not previously inspected the service. We rated it as outstanding because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment and gave them pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait for treatment.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. The service engaged well with patients to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

However:

  • Emergency medicines and equipment were available on each floor. The service checked the emergency medicines and equipment daily. However, we observed two of the oxygen cylinders had not always been checked daily in line with the service’s procedure for resuscitation equipment.